Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Set the exchanges to a clock. (Score 1) 339

Remember, that's regardless of shares transferred or their total value - selling 10,000 shares of Google's $500 stock (total value: $5M) would still get only a one-cent tax.

Nobody just sells 10,000 shares in a single bunch. That'd move the market against you. Instead, large orders are broken up and parcelled out in chunks. Your proposed rule would impose far larger costs on pension funds and mutual funds -- who invented algorithmic trading specifically for this purposes -- than the high frequency market makers do.

Maybe you should learn something about the structure of modern markets -- in particular, about the relative size and importance of the participants -- before you break the whole system to punish the minority who offend you?

Comment Re:Easy: Its the people.(GPL question) (Score 1) 69

For instance, you can do anything you like with Linux in the comfort of your own home, so long as you don't distribute the result. But distribution can become a thorny issue if you're careless, and as a result the GPL offers relatively weak protection of your company's super-secret algorithms. After all, anyone who *legally* acquires part of the code, now has full GPL rights to the whole thing, tasty bits included.

Of course, this is only very slightly less protection than, say, trade secret law offers. In either case, the rule of thumb is to keep your secrets secret.

Companies do occasionally get stung by this when they fail to realize that they are actually "distributing" code. Witness Linksys, which was forced to give away its changes to the Linux kernel, probably because it simply never occurred to the developers that selling a device constituted "distribution" of the image in the firmware. The poster's company (or its customers) could conceivably run into the same problem down the line by selling POS units with the customized GPLed drivers installed.

Compare to TiVo, which had the sense to put the interesting code in separate executables that don't derive from anything GPLed.

Comment Scarier (Score 1) 201

No, the reactor was built *in* Mathews House, under the bed of one of the builders (Justin, because he lost the coin toss). I lived right on the other side of that wall for a year.

Furthermore, the reactor was *not* dismantled at the orders of the judges. Fred found it in the back of his truck, still running, a few months later. I don't know what happened to it after that.

The physics majors in question did not use the nuclear material to which they had access, because, as Fred said, it would be pretty silly to use plutonium (the Physics Dept's neutron howitzer) to make plutonium. Their original material was thorium, from the inside of some old vacuum tubes (although their first plan involved americium from ordinary hardware-store smoke detectors).

The one thing they had to borrow from the Dept was the equipment needed to prove plutonium production. *THAT* took a lot of begging, and was the hardest part of the whole thing.

The list item was inspired by a Reader's Digest article about the "Nuclear Boy Scout", who built a breeder reactor in a shed in hopes of making Eagle Scout (he made a Superfund site instead), so, really, any whacko with enough nerve and enough physics books could probably do the same.

Slashdot Top Deals

If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it will serve us right. -- Alistair Cooke

Working...