Comment Re:Safari (Score 1) 92
Comment Good enough for me. (Score 0) 77
Comment AA (Score 0, Flamebait) 701
Comment Good. (Score 1) 157
Comment Hippa (Score 1) 221
Comment Total bps (Score 1) 108
Comment Fermi (Score 1) 249
Comment Thank heavens (Score 0) 61
Comment Suggested (Score 1) 58
Comment Re:just a though (Score 1) 56
You'd never get to see the pictures in any case (nor would any human anytime soon).
Comment Re:7 Megabyte Number (Score 1) 254
Serious question (it's been many moons since I've coded): what sort of data structure is used to represent these insanely large numbers? And how are they manipulated/utilized so they can be used for computation?
Clearly it's well beyond the traditional long datatype.
Comment Re:Did Amazon invent this? (Score 1) 164
What it does is make it harder for the real inventor to revoke a patent once it has been awarded.
Now I think you're just trolling. Section 6 of the AIA actually establishes a process for ANYone to challenge the validity of the patent right immediately after it is awarded and for MORE reasons than currently exist for filing a reexamination.
The purpose of AIA was to lower the amount of court cases contesting patents and free up the USPTO from having to handle "prior art" claims
That was just two sections of the 30+ sections in the bill, many of which have nothing to do with either of these. Please don't pretend like you know what the purpose of the bill is when you don't even know what it contains.
Comment Re:Did Amazon invent this? (Score 2) 164
God, your comment is so misinformed I want to explode.
- First-to-file actually doesn't go into effect until March 2013 so you are wrong on that front.
- This patent was filed in 2008, well before the AIA was signed into law, so even if the first-to-file aspect of AIA had gone into effect on Sept. 16, 2011, it would be irrelevant anyway to this patent
- Your comment - I assume - is some form of dig that first-to-file means companies have carte blanche to file patents on obvious ideas just because somebody doesn't already have a patent on it, which seems to be a viral misunderstanding of the law here on slashdot. First-to-file itself has nothing to do with determining patentability. The AIA - if anything - made it harder to get a patent because it increased what things could be considered when determining novelty of a claim, i.e., under the old laws, some invalidating product could be on sale in another country more than a year ago and it wouldn't be considered, whereas now it will be.
FFS, please STFU until you educate yourself on what you are commenting about.
Comment Re:This Patent won't live long... (Score 1) 164
Thank you, Theaetetus. I've enjoyed reading your responses over the last week. Slashdot has beaten me down to point where I don't have the energy to try and correct people, so I appreciate you saying all the things I'm too tired to say myself.