So you're saying that to have clean water, you must trade with the U.S.? How did people get clean water before the U.S. existed?

"Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to our Elite class Starship journey that takes you from here to Sydney, Australia in a dazzling 30 minutes. We will be lifting off shortly, following a slight delay until next Tuesday when there might be just the perfect weather in all layers of the atmosphere."

You are a refreshing voice of reason in a morass of broken minds. The most important thing you said: "Have you ever seen the media go full-court-press against *any* drug regardless of how bad its side effects are?" I find it hard to believe that there are people that haven't noticed this. Is it possible that only us top 1% of minds can perceive this? I think the answer is No - most people do. That's what leads the scientific among us to seek an explanation for why so many people are ignoring the phenomenon. My explanation is that a lot of people love the lockdowns and the drama, and hope it can lead to Trump being defeated in November, so they work actively against practical treatments. Yes, killing people in the process. Not their goal, but a side effect that doesn't bother them.

Isn't the real problem that schools feel the need to teach global warming at all? I think that's the heart of what's rubbing all the skeptics the wrong way. They see the disproportionate attention that is paid to a phenomenon that is weakly proven and thus far totally inconsequential in terms of a miniscule sea level and temperature rise, plus pretty much the same climate everywhere that existed 100 years ago. The obvious conclusion is that a bunch of people are trying to work some propaganda into impressionable schoolkids' school experiences--and that's really annoying.