Yeup, as pointed out by another, you make your own. It's even easier if you have a foaming soap dispenser
Original: http://wellnessmama.com/35665/...
Foaming: http://wellnessmama.com/8631/f... I prefer the Almond, but there is unscented Dr Bronners Castile soap
Actually, that's not really good counterproof at all. While the world is complicated, all is cause and effect. Free-will is nothing but an illusion. You make decisions based on your physical state and the information you have at the moment. And you will always make the same decision given the same state/input. (Unless you're chaotic neutral, in which case the chance is 50%)
The better counterargument is intuition and insight. It seems far harder to me to program the irrational leaps in logic that come to a correct conclusion.
Subsidizing the dinosaur burning car industry is "corporate welfare" but subsidizing EV ownership is... what exactly?
It's called investing in the future. You know, like solar cells, geothermal heating/cooling, and LED lightbulbs.
Posting anonymously should automatically post the IP address used. It makes it significantly easier to track the people trashing the site. Yeah, people might use Tor but I have full faith in the laziness of humanity.
Moreover, how about better tracking of the people spamming messages like the infamous 'hosts' one.
Editing comments within 2 minutes of posting.
Yeah, but 'free' video-over-ip is a clear conflict of interest.
For example, Comcast plans to start offering it's own video service and that won't count towards your 300GB cap. Surely you can see that this places Netflix and other streaming services at an unquestionable disadvantage.
First, there's only one aspect to that is really objectionable--that the federal government gets the data with no limitations. A fingerprint scanner isn't a bad idea for something needing low security where you're dealing with forgetful preteens. They're inexpensive although the software/system isn't.
To be honest, I don't really understand the objection to being tracked in the first place. It's just an extension of tracking food stamps. The government makes no secret that if you're going to be the recipient of funds, you're going to be tracked (unless you're a multinational corporation). All that needs to be done is explicitly state that the data will be anonymized (which is likely to be done anyway as this involves minors) and there's minimal issue here.
It's not like Comcast is a wealth of accurate information. According to their own website, there are 6 devices that can support 250 mbps that you can buy off amazon. http://mydeviceinfo.comcast.ne...
On the hand, the packages for any given area are highly dependent on how much Comcast has neglected their network in that area.
The science behind what he's saying isn't really adding up. While there's naturally studies on both sides, this study indicates greater CO2 levels can inhibit growth http://news.stanford.edu/pr/02...
Moreover, methane is significantly more responsible for global climate change because it traps 100 times more heat than CO2. http://www.onegreenplanet.org/...
*facepalm*
You really don't understand the difference between global and local climate, do you? A 4 degree C change in local climate doesn't mean that much. A 4 degree C change in the global average is a catastrophe.
Live within your income, even if you have to borrow to do so. -- Josh Billings
