Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Zero Incentive for Success Equals Certain Failu (Score 1) 116

Some of the fault can be laid squarely at whoever wrote the original contract. One of the contracts in the UK that's currently just starting to make the press is notable because the consultants managing the process (why would you let a consultant manage the process?! Consultants *consult*, dummy! Not a dig at consultants, but the fool who handed over control of the entire process to a third party...) are being paid 10% of the procurement cost of the contract as a bonus.

Yes, you read that right, they're effectively being *told* to buy the most expensive thing possible, with somebody else's money. And, as an added bonus, the system they've chosen (at an estimated 5 times the cost of one of the losers - whom they didn't actually permit to bid) will require months of (paid, of course) work from the consultants concerned to get it to work. I'm in the wrong line of work, really I am...

Image

PhD Candidate Talks About the Physics of Space Battles 361

darthvader100 writes "Gizmodo has run an article with some predictions on what future space battles will be like. The author brings up several theories on propulsion (and orbits), weapons (explosives, kinetic and laser), and design. Sounds like the ideal shape for spaceships will be spherical, like the one in the Hitchhiker's Guide movie."

Comment Re:Not really the new Jack Bauer (Score 1) 339

Have you considered how effective this could be if a certain cult that prefers attack to defence (or, indeed, anyone with anything to hide) can figure out how to work this to their advantage. If this keeps up I'm thinking it won't be too long before prying too deeply into some cults results in accusations of kitten-stomping or worse, because if you're busy cleaning the graffitti from your front door you won't be pursuing the cult in question.

Comment Re:I can think of a few (Score 1) 496

Because to even get at my wired network you need to break into the premises, that's why.

Also, 54Mb/s (or whatever the standard's up to this week) isn't too great when it's shared between 40 people. With wired, they get 1Gb/s. Each. (Yes I know, up to the limits of the server they're connecting to, factoring in that you can't get 100% utilisation ove the link, etc, etc, etc)

Ad

Comment Re:i worked at the world trade center until 9/11/0 (Score 1) 898

If security are telling you to get out, fair enough. But if I'm on a tube train with already-mentioned guy speaking a language I don't understand, and the two SWAT (SO13, in my neck of the woods) officers with him don't bat an eyelid, why on earth would I?

The plane was under escort. Unless you assume the escort was compromised as well (in which case, just who do you trust?) that tells you that the big plane will be handled one way or another.

Comment Re:i worked at the world trade center until 9/11/0 (Score 1) 898

I really am not denigrating new yorkers here, but I must confess that I do not understand the reaction.

This isn't intended as a smug comment, so please do forgive me if it sounds so.

I understand that low flying planes are scary, particularly in the circumstances, but I'm not sure what's expected to be achieved by panic and evacuation. If the plane is close enough to be a threat I sincerely doubt that heading to the lifts is going to save the day. If it's not close enough to be a threat, the F-16s will handle it should it look like becoming one. Either way, action is either needless or pointless.

And, before anybody tells me I have no idea what it's like, etc, etc, etc - I work in London, and on the day of the tube bombings was sat in my offices, right above a train station. My boss was out of the country and asked if I was going to evacuate, so I explained that anything that hadn't gone off by 11am probably wasn't going to, and got back on with work.

Comment Re:Cheating AI (Score 1) 378

Ever tried sending out a battleship in CivII unprotected by an Aegis cruiser? Won't last long if your opponent has cruise missiles. I actually cheated myself once and turned on god mode, to see quite how the AI tagged me with every single one of his cruise missiles (precisely enough to sink the ship, of course). No hostiles within visual range, not even a lurking submarine.

On a related note, if every city bar one has protection from nukes, and that city's deep inside your empire (so that the AI has had no chance to spy the city and get this information) guess what? nuke the city, paratroopers in, instant fifth column. It was around this time that I stopped playing nice with the AI.

Feed Autonomous, laser-guided turret takes aim (engadget.com)

Filed under: Robots

The homegrown home security options out there just keep getting sweeter and sweeter, as yet another go-getter has conjured up an autonomous turret to hold down the fort while the owners are away buying more capacitors and Fruit by the Foot. The programmable weapon relies on an 8 servo serial controller and a s666n High Torque servo motor, not to mention a good bit of programming to get things in working order. What started out as a curious ambition has now developed into quite a serious project, as the creator is hoping to "develop a weapons platform for the Defcon Bots competition," and judging by what we see here, things are lookin' up. The robotic sentry can apparently take out targets on its own or follow a simple laser to targets and fire away, but alas, what good would a made from scratch robotic piece of artillery be without a video to demonstrate? Click on through to see the firepower.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!


Slashdot Top Deals

Keep up the good work! But please don't ask me to help.

Working...