Comment this is missing the most important part! (Score 1) 46
Ok, so AOL is pulling another Amiga. Big deal.
What we all want to know is whether or not we'll soon be getting free coasters in the mail again!
Ok, so AOL is pulling another Amiga. Big deal.
What we all want to know is whether or not we'll soon be getting free coasters in the mail again!
>There is no proprietary infotainment system. GM is adopting Google Built-in.
You say that like it isn't even worse than proprietary . . .
>In 2001 cars didn't come with an AUX port...
yes, but . . . some, such as the Bosch units used in the Northstar Cadillacs of the 1990s, had pads for it on their circuit board.
Open the unit up, attach leads, and apply a signal, and *presto!*, aux appears in the cycle of inputs!
They also tended to be able to mount a CD changer in the trunk.
What suckers!
I'd have built them an AI system to answer the same questions for a tenth the cost!
[and then escaped with $99M while the machine made up answers
no need for an arial drone.
Whether automatically or by remote operator, drop a wheeled motor with the cones at the specified length on a chain.
Either make it able to collect them, or just have a retractor motor to pul it all back in.
next to controlling the truck itself, this is a trivial task.
Wow!
The FSF finally discovered FreebSD?
will they be switching over for their internal use?
hmm. How about
ALL WAYMO
[picture of mushroom cloud]
INITIATE
SELF DESTRUCT.
I've been there.
I was so frustrated that I taped my banana to the wall!
> Here 25 years later, the market is flooded with
>"compact SUVs" essentially the same as the
>Aztek, and just as ugly.
That's not fair.
The modern ones don't even *approach* the Aztec's level of ugliness! But they *are* painfully bland.
the first time I saw an Aztec, my immediate reaction was surprise that AMC was making cars again. It didn't occur to me that anyone else could make something so hideous!
worse.
They were forced to eat a bland cereal that turned soggy before the milk even hit it!
> Most of the very populated parts of Norway don't get too cold,
methinks that we have very different notions of "too cold" . . .
("Above" and "below" should never be part of a temperature!)
hawk
that, or you might be eaten by someone who identifies as a cat . . .
>A regular bank can't magic up $1M out of thin air,
uhmm . . . historically, this is *exactly* where paper money comes from, and why they are called "banknotes"!
Banks issued paper notes promising to pay the bearer a sum of money (i.e., an amount of gold or silver) upon presentation. This was a matter of convenience, the paper being easier to haul about. This led to the practice al matter that a bank could issue more paper than it held money, as long as it was careful enough not to issue so much that too much would come in to redeem.
This isn't fundamentally difference than the practice of lending deposits back out to other borrowers (which is generally how this new money created by the banking system was disbursed, anyway).
In time, government stepped in to regulate how much a bank cold lend in this manner (reserve requirement).
Until WWII, the majority of the paper money in the US was *not* issued by the government, but by banks and some other companies (e.g., Railroads printed $2.40 bills, as $2.40 was a common fare).
Even today, some cites print a local currency, generally (universally) backed 1:1 by federal money. It circulates and shows the effects of buying locally as these local bills start showing up in cash registers. (In the same vein, the US Navy used to deal with local discontent and calls for removing bases of rowdy sailors by paying in $2 bills. Once merchants noticed just how much of their registers were full of that uncommon note, attitudes changed quickly!)
The federal government has the exclusive power to coin money--but this means coining metal; it doesn't stop states or other entities from printing paper money.
doc hawk, displaced economics professor
>30 minutes BEFORE Trump's announcement of 100% tariffs on China, I
the more interesting question is why it took so long for someone to place this bet: Trump's reaction was rather predictable; why did noone move faster?
>Why though?
for the same reason the Enterprise makes swishing, sounds of course!
I consider a new device or technology to have been culturally accepted when it has been used to commit a murder. -- M. Gallaher