Comment Re:Insert Neocon war propaganda (Score 1) 321
EVERY time a civilian die it is a bad thing and true that the original responsibility of the war is by those that started it... but everyone that takes the decision to attack something and end kill civilians also have responsibility. War should not be kill everything that moves. No idea in this case who is right, but i know that is way too easy to order attacks and not care about the consequences
So... now you know how wars should or should not be fought, while sitting in the comfort of your arm chair... Right?
This just a horrific arrogance, self glorification and the most ridiculous virtue signaling that there is nothing to say. Really.
I hope that you try fighting a real war at some point and then will think about what you just recommended.
Comment Re:Insert Neocon war propaganda (Score 1) 321
Comment Re:Insert Neocon war propaganda (Score 1) 321
Comment Re:Stop purchasing Bambu products (Score 2) 107
However, there was a 3rd party attempt on making additional functionality for the printers, Bambu demanded to stop this. Effectively, they reduced your options with your printer. It may or may not be important. But I would take it as a troubling sign. What can they do next? Especially, that there was some bad publicity a year or two ago, already.
Comment Re:Big government is sucking joy out of everything (Score 1) 244
Comment Re:Note that this is a local exploit (Score 3, Informative) 159
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
The responsibility for the actions of he user is on the user, not on the tool.
Nobody said it was on the tool, but sometimes, it is factually also on the provider of the tool. Pretending otherwise doesn't change the law. If the provider is negligent, they can share in responsibility. This is how things other than LLMs work, why not LLMs too?
Guns have safeties even though they can get in your way, for safety's sake. Equipment has lockouts. Most things come with warnings. Automobiles are starting to get automated guardrails like automatic braking and eventually won't allow you to e.g. steer into another vehicle, because it's feasible to prevent and there is a public safety interest. There's simply zero justification for the multi-billion dollar corporations producing and selling access to these LLMs to not institute some guardrails of their own.
I can agree with this. As we learn a tool we can learn how to make it better and safer. And we can also force the manufacturers to implement these measures by finding them negligent if they have not and fining them. Yes, this is how it works.
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 2) 103
If you think about it, it was the computer that allowed that person to interact with the chatbot...
Comment Re:Chatbot Lies (Score 1) 103
Really, if you do not understand something, it does not mean it is bad, it means you do not understand it.
Regarding this specific case, even a hammer can be used to kill a person, it does not mean that the person who designed or made the hammer is a bad guy. The decision to attack people was on that person, let us stop blaming tools and start holding the bad guys accountable. So simple.