This is the problem. You say "speech is dangerous" and this is why it is important to have "freedom of speech". However, there is "a limit". ... Well, where is the limit? Who decides where to put the limit? I bet if some speech is dangerous to the "entrenched powers", the powers will make sure that the limit is well below that.

Do I believe that there is dangerous speech? Absolutely. Do I think this is a "hate speech"? No. What is it exactly? I have been seeing how really bad speech was consider a hate one, now we have moved the post so much that not agreeing with something is already considered "hate speech" which real possibility to become a criminal offense.

This is why, speech should be protected and no, there is no such thing as "hate speech", not if you think about it carefully. Absolutely, there are threats, there are calls for unrest, there are insults. But would it be better if we just call them what they are an treat them accordingly? "Hate speech" to me sounds a lot like "contr-revolution" in Soviet Russia long time ago. Nobody really knew what it meant, but it sure sent a lot of people to Gulag.

What about freedom of speech? Why would anybody come up with this idea if the words are "mightier than the sword"?

You can say anything you want, but unless there is somebody who actually does something. You words will be just vibrations in the air. The person who does it... well it was his / her decision to actually do this. This is really not that complicated.

So, neither the mob nor the guy are responsible for lynching and throwing rocks? The words are... Right? This will stop when we will be holding the people who do bad things responsible and will stop blaming words for the damage bad people do.

This would be true if they have offices in there. Do they? Ali Express may well be doing something like this, but the way I used it.. Just order from them and they send the product by mail, I am not sure this qualifies for "doing business in EU".

I wonder. Ali Express is in China... Why would they care what EU does?

If the patient stops being a drug addict, I thinks it is a minor risk that he may have lower chances to become the next Leonardo da Vinci.

So... now you know how wars should or should not be fought, while sitting in the comfort of your arm chair... Right?

This just a horrific arrogance, self glorification and the most ridiculous virtue signaling that there is nothing to say. Really.

I hope that you try fighting a real war at some point and then will think about what you just recommended.

Now, this is a stupid comment. A country tries to defend itself, some people of the invading country die... Who's fault is this? It is easy to stop the war, russia can pull out at any moment and this will stop the war. Or even better, it could not start it in the first place.

All these people would fine and alive if russia did not invade Ukraine in 2022 and did not grab Crimea in 2014. Simple as that.

Absolutely. It is like Windows vs Linux, Bambu vs Creality. Whatever works for you.

However, there was a 3rd party attempt on making additional functionality for the printers, Bambu demanded to stop this. Effectively, they reduced your options with your printer. It may or may not be important. But I would take it as a troubling sign. What can they do next? Especially, that there was some bad publicity a year or two ago, already.

This is the perfect way to teach people to start ignoring these laws. Good or bad, once you start ignoring them you ignore them all. You just do what you feel like doing.

Have you heard about HPC? Compute clusters? Job schedulers? These have thousands of accounts accessible via SSH logins. FYI.

I can agree with this. As we learn a tool we can learn how to make it better and safer. And we can also force the manufacturers to implement these measures by finding them negligent if they have not and fining them. Yes, this is how it works.

You could, but it is not a fool proof solution and it usually gets in the way and makes your tool inferior. Think about guns with finger print scanners. Has been tried but it is not there because it is not working good enough. You can issue warnings as much as you want but what are you going to achieve? Bad guy already knows that he is a bad guy, a good guy does not plan anythings bad, any warning will be a false positive. Tools are tools, they have to be efficient on what they do. The responsibility for the actions of he user is on the user, not on the tool.

I am not sure I am following you. Tools do not "think", tools do not do anything by themselves. Chatbot did not wake up a person and suggested that the person should attack some people. The person planned that, the tool helped the person to plan. This is what tools do.