Surpassed by encryption that "just works", such as that used in Signal. I can add my friend and text them and I _know_ that only they and I can read it.
It's frictionless, the install of Signal aside. No pissing about with keys, passphrases etc.

GPG is you send me your public key, I send you mine, I mark it as trusted blah blah blah, I copy the secret key around where I need it each time.

I agree, there's no perfect replacement for it in email. But DKIM achieves pretty much the same thing. It doesn't prove the _person_ who sent it, but it proves the domain. That's 99% good enough for almost all commercial/business transactions on the Internet. And it's frictionless, I send the email and it's signed in the background without me having to know what a secret key passphrase is etc etc. It just works. If I get an email from Paypal and it's DKIM/SPF passed, then I'm happy it's really from them, I can trust that.

If that isn't a surpassing of GPG I don't know what is?

DKIM is a form of message signing. Also I love you call PGP simple. Why do you think secure messaging apps have taken off so well, yet PGP is still the realm of, well these days, almost no one? Only a few die hard nerds use it. PGP is terrible, clunky and a giant joke. Sure it was great 30 years when it was invented, but it's been long surpassed.

Suggesting it as a solution to anything in 2025 shows how out of touch you are with reality. The world has _long_ since moved on.

Until someone comes along who's running Redhat.

When did you last use it? I haven't seen any problems such as this while I've been using it.

Do you have a lot of other addons installed, maybe there's a conflict going on.

It's just above the zoom in and out slider, a little round circle in a square (with cut off corners). Or just below the hand with the four arrows.

Click that and a bar will appear at the top of firefox and ask if it's ok to share your location.

Hope this helps.

I have a Netscreen 5GT-Wireless which lets me setup more than one SSID, plus rate limit and control services.

I have our home ESSID which is WPA2 protected and has no limits on it.

I have another SSID called "Free Web And Email" which is limited to 256kb/s and only allows DNS, HTTP, HTTPS, POP3, SMTP, Secure SMTP, IMAP and IMAPs.

Lots of people connect to it and use it for exactly it's name. It's rate limited so that they can't take all our BW and it's port limited so they don't ruin it for the others connected to the Free AP by running Bittorrent etc. Though its limitations obviously wouldn't stop clever people.

I'm amazed at how many people connect to it on a regular basis. There's a few people that obviously use it for all their Internet requirements, while I get a lot of random connects to it as well.

It's also handy for my PSP, which doesn't understand WPA2.

I think handing our Free Wifi is a great idea, though I'd be loath to do it without being able to have good control over it as I do. I wouldn't do it with a simple AP that gave me no control.