Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Businesses

Psychopathic CEOs Are Rife In Silicon Valley, Experts Say (theguardian.com) 274

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: There is a high proportion of psychopathic CEOs in Silicon Valley, enabled by protective investors and weak human resources departments, according to a panel of experts at SXSW festival. Although the term "psychopath" typically has negative connotations, some of the attributes associated with the disorder can be advantageous in a business setting. "A true psychopath is someone that has a blend of emotional, interpersonal, lifestyle and behavioral deficits but an uncanny ability to mask them. They come across as very charming, very gregarious. But underneath there's a profound lack of remorse, callousness and a lack of empathy," said forensic and clinical psychologist Michael Woodworth, who has worked with psychopathic murderers in high security prisons, on Tuesday. According to recent studies there's a high prevalence of psychopathy among high-level executives in a corporate environment: 4-8% compared with 1% in the general population. This makes sense, according to Silicon Valley venture capitalist Bryan Stolle because "it's an irrational act to start a company." "You have to have a tremendous amount of ego [and] self-deception to embark on that journey," he said. "You have to make sacrifices and give up things, including sometimes a marriage, family and friends. And you have to convince other people. So they are mostly very charismatic, charming and make you suspend the disbelief that something can't be done." However, the positive attributes are accompanied by manipulation. "One of the main things that makes them extremely difficult to organizations is their willingness to manipulate through deception," said Jeff Hancock, a Stanford social scientist who studies psychopathy. "Psychopaths will handpick people they can use as lackeys or supporters, such as someone in HR they can have in their wheelhouse," said Woodworth.

Comment Re:First you have to be able to imagine the palace (Score 1) 190

Same here. I have aphantasia, too, and had no idea I had it. I thought people were being figurative when they would tell me to visualize something. Trying the memory palace technique never worked for me, although I was one of those nerds that memorized pi to 100+ digits just for the hell of it.

Comment Re:Trump on Sweden (Score 1) 408

A key skill of a leader is to communicate and bring as many people on the journey as possible. Trump is an absolute failure at this on all levels.

I totally agree with this. The choices, though, seems to be either to jump on each and every mistake he makes in a speech in detail and hang onto it for days at a time, or to try to figure out what he's really saying and discuss that. The former is just antagonizing anyone who might agree (even a little) with whatever his actual point is. Probably smarter to engage on the actual issue, where real discussion might be had.

Comment Re:Trump on Sweden (Score 1) 408

Obama flubbing a line and Trump basing public policy based on irrational and emotionally visceral feelings are not the same thing.

The flub that Trump appeared to make was describing an incident that happened "last night", when what he appeared to want to describe was an incident that was covered in a show he watched last night. That's similar to Obama's flub, as far as I can see.

The topic of what he is basing public policy on is another discussion.

Comment Re:Trump on Sweden (Score 1) 408

Trump is a terrible public speaker. He's loose with his facts, he exaggerates, he makes claims that he believes to be true without actually looking into them, and he appeals more to people's emotions than he does to their intellect. Figuring out what he meant to say takes a little work. After looking into this a bit, I ended up agreeing with the parent poster. That does appear to be what he meant, as far as I can tell. If all you want to do is call Trump a liar and ignore the rest, he sets himself up for that as no President has before him. If you are interested in what he really means, you have to do a little guess work since he's so bad at explaining it.

I thought the same thing when Obama made his "traveled to 57 states" remark. It's obvious he meant 47, that he started at 50 and subtracted the three he hadn't been to, and that he flubbed it when he said it. Same kind of thing, just on a smaller scale and it happened far less often.

I'm not a Trump supporter, I didn't vote for him, but he's the guy we've got. I don't find it particularly helpful to jump on every mistake he makes when speaking, and I have reduced my news intake accordingly since that's as far into it as the media seems to want to go.

Comment Re:"...which begs the question..." (Score 1) 341

I've always assumed there is a sarcastic component to "could care less". Something along the lines of: "I suppose I could care less about this. I mean, if I think about it for long enough I should be able to devise some kind of scenario in which the amount that I care about this topic drops even further. But I can't seem to find the motivation to actually do it, though".

Comment Re:Poor Nazis (Score 1) 978

The actual riots in both cases where people get hurt and property gets destroyed, now or in the past, are all reprehensible. One group doing it doesn't excuse the other. If a person is so upset that one presidential candidate won over another that they think they should burn something, hit somebody, or vandalize something, then that person needs mental health care regardless of what box they checked on the ballot. Peaceful protesting is to be encouraged, but seems out of vogue these days.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any program which runs right is obsolete.

Working...