Not at all, my concerns are totally to do with how he holds back the FSF by being it's leader.
Free Software Foundation is as much a political group as anything, they need someone who can be rational and related to which can campaign on important issues. His PETA approach to software just discourages more people then it encourages. Instead of taking a positive approach to free software ideals they've gone on the offensive which we all know that it just results in everyone ignoring you. His child like behaviour, poor attire and refusal to join the internet of today is something which holds back the FSF in terms of encouraging free software ideals to a much wider audience.
If you think RMS does not know his position is radical, then you need to remove your fingers from your eyes and ears. On multiple occasions when he came to France and i could listen to him, he mentionned that and replied that his goal is NOT to be the newcomer's first help to Free Software - but rather the hypothetical, utopian goals the Free software should aim for, in order to keep going in the best direction. Other organizations do have a more practical and easier approach, and do that much better.
The steady state of disks is full. -- Ken Thompson
