Re:Eh, wikipedia's gone down hill anyways. (Score 1)

You should really find out why they are so pissed about what the Admins on Wiki are doing, Before you blast them for speaking out against the process on Wiki. Here are some links to give you both sides. First Wiki's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_fo r_deletion/Wehatetech Now there side http://www.wehatetech.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2& file=viewtopic&t=444 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_fo r_deletion/Podcasts/We_Hate_tech I would also like to point out that in the Wikipedia:Deletion policy states: "If an article is repeatedly re-created by unassociated editors after being deleted, this may be evidence of a need for an article. Conversely, if an article is repeatedly nominated for deletion, this is not in and of itself evidence that it should be deleted. In some cases, repeated attempts to have an article deleted may even be considered disruptive. If in doubt, don't delete." See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_po licy I would also like to point out that many of us who have just registered with Wiki did so to participate in the AfD conversation. We have not had any reason to register with Wiki before this debate. On top of all that some of us who have been to the site before have not found anything to edit. If editing for no good reason is what it takes to have your voice heard and considered that's ridiculous. I find the whole thing preposterous that the Admins should go to such lengths to quash such a small page so many times. It's painfully obvious that the Admins don't give a crap what people who actually care about and would edit the article have to say.