Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Wouldn't it be easier and better... (Score 1) 277

95% of all vendors at "gun shows" which sell guns are FFL (federal firearms licensee, legal gun dealers). Any gun sold/transfer from an FFL to a regular person (non-FFL) must have a background check and 4473 form completed. The vast majority of people attending gun shows and buying guns thus are subject to background checks.

Now there are the simple collectors of guns which show up and sell from their collection on occasion, or the guys walking around with a gun strapped to their back and a "for sale" sign in the barrel which don't need a background check, but they have become few and far between. Websites like guntrader have become like a craigslist for people who want to sell their guns face to face.

Every time I've bought a gun Face to Face I've done a bill of sale for the gun, and showed my CWP or drivers license. (it's not legal to sell hand-guns to out of state residents with out shipping it to a FFL in their state)

This "gun show loophole" is in reality a hollow argument. If a rational person actually researches the laws, you find out how hard it is to buy a gun with out a background check.

Comment Re:Who is Bruce Perens? (Score 2) 201

He is asking for support of the person that's recording/editing/posting the videos, "Ham Radio Now"
Gary, KN4AQ pays his own way and his own video equipment to put together some great videos of every segment at DCC. It's really worth it. Many people are unable to attend and this gives them the ability to view it. However this is a lot of work and it's not cheap. So a donation to Gary/ARVN offsets the cost.

Comment Re:Nasa and Belcore got it right (Score 1) 374

+1 for cable lacing. I'll show a couple pictures of lacing i did during a lab evaulation of some gear a few years ago.

168 DS1's all in a rack



Power Cables:

The entire setup:

Comment Bandwidth != airtime (Score 2, Insightful) 309

The issue with all Cellular networks (and any half duplex shared media) is that the time it takes to send 256 bytes over the air is not 1/4 the time it takes to send 64 bytes, it's more like .6 to .8 times. The signaling setup and tear down takes time to transmit packets over the air, which is fixed no matter the amount of bytes you send.

This impacts the network as the real bandwidth of a cellular network is not in BPS but airtime. If all the airtime is used up for signaling small packets for marginal signal customers, even the customers that have strong signals and want to send a http request will have to wait. Stateless protocols cause the worst problems as once a flow is established the PDSN/HA/etc does not have to do anymore work. With a app that generates a new flow for each data transfer of 10 bytes to say "hey im still online", the signaling bandwidth is used up and the network quickly falls to it's knees.

This massive use of third party apps and data is still quite new to the providers. This scares them, as you can't just turn on netflow, setup nfsen and see what's going on. Lucent is about the only company out there with a ntop like solution for the providers, but it's new and still being deployed.

I know the IP people are asking how they don't know what's on their network, but it's not just IP traffic you need to monitor, as all the carriers do so. monitoring the IP traffic only gives you the 10000 foot level view, to actually say how the loading on the radio layer relates to the applications in use is a very new requirement. While you can pull hundreds of data point for voice traffic from each radio and switch, at best you can find an error rate and total transfer for the busy hour on the data counters.

It's the providers problem for selling a data plan based on bytes transferred , rather than airtime used.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I have not the slightest confidence in 'spiritual manifestations.'" -- Robert G. Ingersoll