Comment Re:Well.. (Score 1) 211
Excellent argument. However, since it is based on a false premise, the conclusion does not stand.
As people have been saying repeatedly, there is absolutely nothing in the design of ColorForth that requires color. Rewrite the editor and you can have a "ColorForth" that uses richtext or tone of voice or whatever. With 100% identical precompiled source in the original format.
The language is in fact accessible by design. The pilot implementation is not accessible, but if you toss out everthing that is accessible by design because it wasn't accessible in its first pilot implementation, how much of modern technology will you be left with?
As people have been saying repeatedly, there is absolutely nothing in the design of ColorForth that requires color. Rewrite the editor and you can have a "ColorForth" that uses richtext or tone of voice or whatever. With 100% identical precompiled source in the original format.
The language is in fact accessible by design. The pilot implementation is not accessible, but if you toss out everthing that is accessible by design because it wasn't accessible in its first pilot implementation, how much of modern technology will you be left with?
