The randomly generated paper did not get into a CS conference... or even a "real" conference for that matter. WMSCI is, as far as I can tell, a money-making operation. Everyone in my department gets spammed from them (and the situation is the same elsewhere, hence
Mazieres and Kohler's work).
Actually, if you read WMSCI's mission, it looks randomly generated too:
The purpose of WMSCI 2005 is to promote discussion and interaction between researchers and practitioners focused on disciplines as well as different areas.
So CS might have problems, but you cannot argue that based on WMSCI.