| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Something doesn't make sense | ||||||
| Re:Something doesn't make sense | ||||||
| attached to Mozilla Foundation Launches Mozilla Corporation | ||||||
| Re:Don't evolve; stay a *standard* | ||||||
| Re:JS rocks | ||||||
| attached to JavaScript Inventor Speaks Out | ||||||
| Re:Wow | ||||||
| Re:Funny... I thought ECMAScript was an open stand | ||||||
| Re:Wow | ||||||
| attached to Mozilla Extending Javascript? | ||||||
| Re:Yeah, But... | ||||||
| Re:Yeah, But... | ||||||
| Re:Yeah, But... | ||||||
| Re:Yeah, But... | ||||||
| Re:Planned from the beginning? | ||||||
| Re:Planned from the beginning? | ||||||
| attached to AJAX Buzzword Reinvigorates Javascript | ||||||
| Re:Tabbed browsing broken for 2 years | ||||||
| attached to Firefox 1.0 Released | ||||||
| Re:Who is it? | ||||||
| Re:Who is it? | ||||||
| attached to Ars Technica Interviews Scott Collins | ||||||
| Re:Why WG? | ||||||
| Re:I don't get it | ||||||
| attached to Mozilla, Opera Form Group to Develop Web App Specs | ||||||
| Re:Anyone know technical details? | ||||||
| attached to Mozilla And Opera Team Up For Web Forms Standard | ||||||
| Re:Denied migration (was Re:it's pronounced "XAML" | ||||||
| Re:What about XUL? | ||||||
| attached to Miguel de Icaza on Mono, Ximian/Novell, XAML | ||||||
| Re:'Proprietary' extensions | ||||||
| Re:'Proprietary' extensions | ||||||
| Re:'Proprietary' extensions | ||||||
| attached to Mozilla Foundation Meets The GNOME Foundation | ||||||
The confusion of a staff member is measured by the length of his memos. -- New York Times, Jan. 20, 1981
