My apologies, Willie...

Expensive european workers that pay expensive taxes in Europe... the bill is not really as high as you'd imagine.

A game server does not need to be open source to work, and several games distribute the game server along with the game itself. For example Space Engineers does distribute the server binaries (and the modding SDK) along with the game itself.

That's the sort of feature that could be added on a machine without the need of being integrated so tightly that if it fails the rest of the machine is disabled. Modular design is nothing new.

It works great for a multitude of uses and experts are ready to extol its virtues... I can see a parallel.

With an added pinch of STRAWMAN:
"an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument." - Oxford Language

I suspect that according to you for the USA the number should be at least 2

Everybody dies. Some people should be more aware of this.

But you are also a drain on the national healthcare system that you did not pay into, so no, it's not that simple.

Technically yes, it will burn a windows ISO on install media, and that's arguably spyware or even malware. I don't think it adds MORE malware than Windows itself, though.

Maybe the lights were off

There's one major problem with nuclear power plants. Half a solar plant or half a wind farm still produce half the energy of the full installation, while half a fission plant produces zero energy. To get a nuclear plant running takes time, and you need to spend money all the time it is being built. And while it is running. And when you have to dismantle it.

Does it really matter? It's not like if that money is not used for loan forgiveness it is going to stay in your pockets.

I thought the fraud conviction was because he overinflated the value of his assets in order to mislead investors? Using company funds to hide his adultery surely counts as embezzling, not fraud.

No, you see, the person you are replying to has put forward a theory, that this move might be to attempt and hide the impact of economic policies on company quarterly earnings by delaying the reporting of those earnings. This might be true or false, but it's not "just orange man bad" That is YOUR assertion, and sincerely a very weak defense of your disagreement.Of course, you could argue that it makes little difference whether the loss in profit is reported every three months or every six months, unless you really believe that things will improve in the six month period. I suspect what will happen is that the half-yearly reports will only show a much higher swing, and make it harder for investors to adjust, making the market as a whole a bit more volatile. It will also make insider trading much more profitable. Now, do you happen to have a better counterargument than "you are only saying this because you don't like my guy"?