Comment Re:How about getting back to the basics? (Score 1) 142
Longtime Mozilla user here, from back in the Netscape days. (And before that Mosaic, if you consider that "Mozilla".)
I like the approach of in-house "features" that are enabled as plugins. Reading the comments make it clear that users want different features.
Everyone wants stability and speed, though.
So give the users who actually want to use Pocket (or whatever the feature is) the ability to do so. But don't force the remaining 99.9% to even have it "installed" if they don't.
(On the Pocket note, I haven't come across a single person who uses it. Ever. But they may be out there, and I couldn't care less if they want to use it. I just don't want it bloating *my* browser.)
I would like to at least give a nod to some actual usability improvements. I recently had to upgrade to a newer ESR because a number of critical sites stopped working (see related comments about Chromium compatibility. It hearkens back to the old IE-compatibility days, which I hated then, and still hate now.). The I regularly have dozens and dozens of windows open, and dozens and dozens of tabs in each of those, so the "new?" ability to search for a tab is a huge help.
As far as the "make a good web browser that browses the web really well" comments, that's a loaded statement. For example, I doubt many users today would argue that the ability to play videos in a browser is a requirement. NVIDIA has this cool up-scaling technology called "RTX Video Super Resolution" that makes old, low-res videos look somewhat decent. My browsing experience is better because of that addition by the core developers.
I haven't looked at the code, but I get the impression that level of integration would be very difficult to achieve with an API. And I have enough experience working with plugin APIs to know that there's at least overhead involved in having them, and more overhead the "lower" they go.
So, if I can have RTX Video Super Resolution as a light-weight plugin, I'll take it. But I'm also perfectly happy that they have implemented it in Firefox already. I suspect people using AMD GPUs aren't as happy as I am. So it's a bit of a mixed bag. YMMV.