...an article worth considering from Princeton University's Zeynep Tufekci:
We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives
Since scientists began playing around with dangerous pathogens in laboratories, the world has experienced four or five pandemics, depending on how you count. One of them, the 1977 Russian flu, was almost certainly sparked by a research mishap. Some Western scientists quickly suspected the odd virus had resided in a lab freezer for a couple of decades, but they kept mostly quiet for fear of ruffling feathers.
Yet in 2020, when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And when a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance lost a grant because it was planning to conduct risky research into bat viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology â" research that, if conducted with lax safety standards, could have resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world â" no fewer than 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend the organization.
So the Wuhan research was totally safe, and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission â" it certainly seemed like consensus.
We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan laboratoryâ(TM)s research, the details that have since emerged show that safety precautions might have been terrifyingly lax.
I'm not from the US, so I keep wondering: is unemployment so bad in the US? Are American citizens truly so desperately in need of those manufacturing jobs?
No but also yes to your questions in that order. I'm a Canadian but we also suffered similarly to the US and people who live in a former manufacturing town know what it's like when their manufacturer leaves for lower cost countries. I lived in a GM town for what felt like an eternity, where you had guys who weren't too bright, who didn't have an education, and had no marketable skills yet somehow owned a large four bedroom home, an RV, a cottage, a boat, and went on plenty of vacations with their nuclear family of 3 kids, kids that were all put through university on their father's salary. The richest people around were high school educated GM workers and there were almost 10,000 people who were in that category in my city. Then GM shut down a plant and wiped out 90% of those jobs, it was devastating to our region's economy.
According to the WEF, the United States has lost more than 2.7 million of these jobs to China over the past 24 years. So when you ask if American citizens are truly so desperately in need of those manufacturing jobs I would say that every first world country would truly so desperately want those manufacturing jobs.
People are comment about what "he" did, which demonstrates they didn't even read the article or watch the video before commenting
... a demonstration which has zero impact on the opinions of posters. This woman disrupted a company event to engage in personal activism. What more does anyone need to know? I don't care about her feelings or hearing about her perception of what her company's product may be used for. I bet Israel uses Windows' computers too!
they all have very high expectations, and there just aren't tons of high-paying jobs where you just show up, or "work" from home.
This has been my experience as well. We've put up job postings for IT positions over the past couple years and almost every job applicant in Gen Z years are asking how many hours they're expected to come into the office. "all of them" would be my answer but the woman handling the human resources communications basically copies and pastes the amount of hours the job posting was listed at, if she even replies at all. Despite that we did end up with a shiny new Gen Z worker who didn't expect to work from home and he's been doing a great job so not all of them are aiming for the top level jobs right out the gate.
And, arguably, the current crisis at Tesla is because Musk is playing President rather than being "out on the factory floor".
The "current crisis" is manufactured and amplified externally. Nobody is doxxing Tesla owners with maps using Molotov cocktails as map cursors or burning lots full of vehicles in for service in some way that is a function of whether Musk is personally present on the factory floor vs doing something else he thinks is vital to our economic survival. All of it is ginned up hate based on the politics surrounding the pruning of vast left slush funds and debt-funded waste that has to go away. That's an entire industry with vested interests, and acting against it certainly brings out the coordinated hate, attacks on stock value, media smearing, and of course thousands of people who now say he's a nazi though they can't actually articulate why they think that.
No, him being "on the factory floor" or off it doesn't precipitate some "current crisis," except in the sense that entrenched interests currently having their oxen gored by drying up things like the NGO money laundering industry are doing their best to try to wreck the company to make a point.
It cost 3.7 million. There should be no just here. Okay that's like a tenth or less than what usually is spent but still.
So the people who made it should have been earning minimum wage, is that your point? Spread that dollar amount across five and half yeads and even modest team of people and their overhead, and they're making middle five figures after taxes. Is that a lot, to you?
Just 3.7 million. Just. lol.
It took five and a half years to make it. So, in perhaps over-simplified terms, that's ~$670k year working on it. Let's say you had six people working on the project, and had NO overhead at all beyond their personal income while making it. That's roughly $100k per person before they paid taxes, which is either pretty good or not very good at all, depending on where you live and how. But one supposes they also had some overhead. This wasn't done on their kids' laptops at night. There was music to compose, audio to record and design, and a lot more.
So, yeah. "Just" 3.7M is a fair characterization.
We know damn well RTO has far more to do with keeping middle-earth management cube farmers employed for obsolete reasons
I don't know any such thing, I prefer to work at the office because I'm more productive. The only time I want to work from home is when it's advantageous to my personal life, like I have to catch up on laundry or someone is coming to fix an internet issue. My brain prefers to rest away from work at home and prefers to lock in at work at the office.
"A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." -- William James