They are even encrypting the officers names!

TFS wrote:
"Lt. Phlunte Riddle"

There was this company called Google that came out of some phD students' work. I think it's still around and doing business.

Breyer's dissent has a bit of nice reasoning in it, actually.

"But what sense does it make to forbid selling to a 13-year-old boy a magazine with an image of a nude woman, while protecting a sale to that 13 year-old of an interactive video game in which he actively, but virtually, binds and gags the woman, then tortures and kills her? What kind of First Amendment would permit the government to protect children by restrict- ing sales of that extremely violent video game only when the woman—bound, gagged, tortured, and killed—is also topless? This anomaly is not compelled by the First Amendment. It disappears once one recognizes that extreme violence, where interactive, and without literary, artistic, or similar justification, can prove at least as, if not more, harmful to children as photographs of nudity. And the record here is more than adequate to support such a view. That is why I believe that Ginsberg controls the outcome here a fortiori. And it is why I believe California’s law is constitutional on its face. "

Basically, the court had previously ruled that it's ok to ban porn sales to children, and the court is generally bound to prior rulings unless overturned by new legislation. The logic used to ban pornography sales to kids still applies to this case. Not saying it's a good law, but Breyer's position makes a lot of sense.

Actually, I think they could successfully pull off a Tiger Woods dating sim.

I think Rolling Releases will begin sometime after Quizzical Quail is released.

"If we cower in our shoes and crap in pants, the terrorists have won."

I can't cower in my shoes....TSA made me remove them.

Also, they took my pants.

John Edward must be thrilled to know that he is a scientist now.