Comment This could be disturbingly bad (Score 1) 121
- Further study and monitoring of the economic impact of A.I. on jobs.
I really doubt the government will have the best interest of all people, so long as the wealthy donors benefit... it's working.
- Creating a clear U.S. policy regarding the development and use of "Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems."
"It was justified based on the algorithms determination that this was a credible threat, despite the fact it was an elementary school. The regulatory AI agrees."
Comment Way to sensationalize (Score 1) 115
I get it, the poor children who didn't choose to be born in these countries are going to suffer, but really this is not news.
Comment Self regulating (Score 1) 400
Comment It has to be the (Score 2) 115
Comment Re:I feel like a luddite sometimes (Score 1) 771
Comment Re:those who dont use these sites (Score 1) 189
It obviously costs money to store all those photos since they do require, you know, physical memory space and such.
This is a natural move, install something that lets us market to you and gather more data on you or stop using our free service.
I'll delete my account if they delete my photo's. Stop trying to squeeze a dime out of me, I have no real need for your service.
Comment Your belief is wrong (Score 1) 559
The aliens knowing that they've received a sentient-species-transmission, and then more importantly, deciphering and understanding it is another order higher in requirements for successful communication, but pales compared to the sheer vastness of space. Due to distance, interference, evolution and power requirements the odds are against:
- A. Them receiving a usable signal
- B. Them deciphering it without anything to compare it to other than the signals following it
- C. Them having the technical savvy to locate the source
- D. Them having the technical savvy to send us back a usable signal
- E. Us understanding that we're receiving a response
- F. Us deciphering the response
- G. Us comprehending what they send
Consider we've been transmitting into space for 121 years so far, that encompasses (from what I can find on stars within 100 ly) something like 10,000 stars. A response at that point takes effectively two and a half centuries to return, so for all intents and purposes they should be considered extinct, while being a mathematical possibility. And that's at the speed of light, not at the speed of Voyager.
Comment Even Simpler Solution (Score 1) 125
Better yet, someone make the police shrouds from A Scanner Darkly.
Of course these ideas will only work until law "enforcement" come up with biomechanical movement analysis to figure out who you are based on how you move.
Comment Re:security best practice? (Score 1) 924
And in what way does this new mechanism "enhance security"? Running something in the background after you log out doesn't give you any more privileges than if you remained logged in.
I get people being angry about Systemd, change is hard on people and giving up behaviours/knowledge that the community has prided as a point of recognition feels like losing a culture divergence from the Unix philosophy. Unfortunately they're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
The proper perspective is to understand that Systemd is a significant conceptual step towards targeting the enterprise with Linux. This change has made it so Linux effectively now has a centrally manageable remote process control system built in by default. This is an additional level of control over user space processes, which at the enterprise level, is a very valuable feature. Effectively the *nix version of Microsofts "Applocker" in an environment where a user often operates at higher levels of permissions. That's how enterprises operate their networks and a significant step up in securing Linux from that point of view.
Don't dare say sudo in response, great single system low user count idea, but again I'm talking about the enterprise level, hundreds of thousands of servers, desktops and accounts.
Submission + - Smartphone surveillance tech used to target anti-abortion ads at pregnant women
Last year, an enterprising advertising executive based in Boston, Massachusetts, had an idea: Instead of using his sophisticated mobile surveillance techniques to figure out which consumers might be interested in buying shoes, cars, or any of the other products typically advertised online, what if he used the same technology to figure out which women were potentially contemplating abortion, and send them ads on behalf of anti-choice organizations?
Regardless of one's personal stance on the pro-choice/anti-abortion debate, the unfettered use of tracking and ad-targeting technology which makes this kind of application possible is surely a cause for concern. In Europe, Canada and many other parts of the world, the use of a person's data in this way would be illegal thanks to strict privacy laws. Is it time for the US to consider a similar approach to protect its citizens?
Submission + - Millennials Value Speed Over Security (dailydot.com)
Submission + - '50% of Misogynistic Tweets From Women' (bbc.com)
Comment The latest tech (Score 1) 77
I wonder if it'll be able to play lemmings.