Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment This could be disturbingly bad (Score 1) 121

- Further study and monitoring of the economic impact of A.I. on jobs.

I really doubt the government will have the best interest of all people, so long as the wealthy donors benefit... it's working.

- Creating a clear U.S. policy regarding the development and use of "Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems."

"It was justified based on the algorithms determination that this was a credible threat, despite the fact it was an elementary school. The regulatory AI agrees."

Comment Way to sensationalize (Score 1) 115

Considering roughly 29% of the world population lives in two countries that are more focused on growth and money than citizen health, this easily shows a scary statistic. Get China and India to clean up their industry and bam, 65% of the world population now lives in in this horrid air quality.

I get it, the poor children who didn't choose to be born in these countries are going to suffer, but really this is not news.

Comment Self regulating (Score 1) 400

Automate enough people out of jobs and you'll destroy capitalism in the US. Once enough people are not able to find work, you're going to have to support them or be overtly for the mass death of your own neighbors. The 0.1% will not survive this unscathed by economic policy. Eventually enough people will be pissed off to the point of voting for socialism since those who run the business are making it impossible for the former employed to live.

Comment Re:those who dont use these sites (Score 1) 189

You have it wrong.

It obviously costs money to store all those photos since they do require, you know, physical memory space and such.

This is a natural move, install something that lets us market to you and gather more data on you or stop using our free service.

I'll delete my account if they delete my photo's. Stop trying to squeeze a dime out of me, I have no real need for your service.

Comment Your belief is wrong (Score 1) 559

It is not technically difficult or expensive to send messages into space. We've been sending them since 1895, at the speed of light. We just don't consider them to be intentional messages since they're daily broadcasts to us. Granted the majority are too weak to be of any real use, but that's the whole point, they arrive at Proxima in 4.5 years instead of X0,000 years.

The aliens knowing that they've received a sentient-species-transmission, and then more importantly, deciphering and understanding it is another order higher in requirements for successful communication, but pales compared to the sheer vastness of space. Due to distance, interference, evolution and power requirements the odds are against:
  • A. Them receiving a usable signal
  • B. Them deciphering it without anything to compare it to other than the signals following it
  • C. Them having the technical savvy to locate the source
  • D. Them having the technical savvy to send us back a usable signal
  • E. Us understanding that we're receiving a response
  • F. Us deciphering the response
  • G. Us comprehending what they send

    Consider we've been transmitting into space for 121 years so far, that encompasses (from what I can find on stars within 100 ly) something like 10,000 stars. A response at that point takes effectively two and a half centuries to return, so for all intents and purposes they should be considered extinct, while being a mathematical possibility. And that's at the speed of light, not at the speed of Voyager.

Comment Even Simpler Solution (Score 1) 125

Walk around like the guys in Stephenson's Cryptonomicon. Trench coat, wide brimmed hat and a bandana. If enough people do it you're back to being relatively more anonymous.

Better yet, someone make the police shrouds from A Scanner Darkly.

Of course these ideas will only work until law "enforcement" come up with biomechanical movement analysis to figure out who you are based on how you move.

Comment Re:security best practice? (Score 1) 924

And in what way does this new mechanism "enhance security"? Running something in the background after you log out doesn't give you any more privileges than if you remained logged in.

I get people being angry about Systemd, change is hard on people and giving up behaviours/knowledge that the community has prided as a point of recognition feels like losing a culture divergence from the Unix philosophy. Unfortunately they're looking at it from the wrong perspective.

The proper perspective is to understand that Systemd is a significant conceptual step towards targeting the enterprise with Linux. This change has made it so Linux effectively now has a centrally manageable remote process control system built in by default. This is an additional level of control over user space processes, which at the enterprise level, is a very valuable feature. Effectively the *nix version of Microsofts "Applocker" in an environment where a user often operates at higher levels of permissions. That's how enterprises operate their networks and a significant step up in securing Linux from that point of view.

Don't dare say sudo in response, great single system low user count idea, but again I'm talking about the enterprise level, hundreds of thousands of servers, desktops and accounts.

Submission + - Smartphone surveillance tech used to target anti-abortion ads at pregnant women

VoiceOfDoom writes: From Rewire

Last year, an enterprising advertising executive based in Boston, Massachusetts, had an idea: Instead of using his sophisticated mobile surveillance techniques to figure out which consumers might be interested in buying shoes, cars, or any of the other products typically advertised online, what if he used the same technology to figure out which women were potentially contemplating abortion, and send them ads on behalf of anti-choice organizations?

Regardless of one's personal stance on the pro-choice/anti-abortion debate, the unfettered use of tracking and ad-targeting technology which makes this kind of application possible is surely a cause for concern. In Europe, Canada and many other parts of the world, the use of a person's data in this way would be illegal thanks to strict privacy laws. Is it time for the US to consider a similar approach to protect its citizens?

Submission + - Millennials Value Speed Over Security (dailydot.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Millennials stand apart from other Americans in preferring faster Internet access to safer Internet access, according to a new survey. When digital-authentication firm SecureAuth asked people from all age groups whether they would rather be safer online or browse faster online, 57 percent of Americans chose security and 43 percent chose speed. But among millennials, the results were almost reversed: 54 percent chose speed over security. Young people are also more willing than the overall population to share sensitive information over public Wi-Fi connections, which are notoriously insecure as they allow anyone on the network to analyze and intercept passing traffic. While a clear majority (57 percent) of Americans told SecureAuth that they transmitted such information over public Wi-Fi, nearly eight in 10 (78 percent) of millennials said they did so. A surprising 44 percent of millennials believe their data is generally safe from hackers, and millennials are more likely than members of other age groups to share account passwords with friends. Americans overall are paying more attention to some aspects of digital security. An October 2015 study by the wireless industry's trade group found that 61 percent of Americans use passwords on their smartphones and 58 percent use them on their tablets, compared to 50 percent and 48 percent, respectively, in 2012.

Submission + - '50% of Misogynistic Tweets From Women' (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A study performed by researchers behind the Internet campaign "Reclaim," suggests that half of all misogynistic tweets posted on Twitter come from women. The campaign is designed to show the public the impact of hate speech and abuse on social media. They have opened an online forum to discuss ways to make the internet less aggressive, sexist, racist and homophobic. For the study, thinktank Demos counted the number of uses of "slut" and "whore" were used on Twitter to indicate misogyny. They analyzed 1.5 million tweets sent by UK Twitter users over a three-week period and used its own Natural Language Processing tool to filter the tweets in order to determine whether they were used aggressively, conversationally, or for self-identification. Demos found 6,500 unique users being targeted by 10,000 explicitly aggressive and misogynistic tweets. Internationally, they recorded more than 200,000 aggressive tweets using the same terms that were sent to 80,000 people in the same three-week period. It claims it found 50 percent of the abusive tweets to have come from women.

Slashdot Top Deals

Long computations which yield zero are probably all for naught.

Working...