'Flamebait'? Who moderates this board?

Even if the stats upon which you base your assertion are correct (and I am not conceding this, I just can't be bothered to confirm them), you seem to me to be commiting an elemental correlation/causation fallacy. Or do you have something from the literature documenting causation? If so, please share.

Yep. The whole hydrogen thing has been anti-BEV FUD from the start really. This is just the latest salvo.

Yeah, I back-enveloped the math too and I don't see how any commercial-scale system you might imagine could be anywhere near competitive.

If you look at Toyota's entire history with hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, it's really just been an exercise in FUD to justify their unwillingness to pursue BEV technology, which, after all, they were an early leader in. I think this is just one more effort in that vein.

Agree totally. I'm still old school podcatcher (currently using Pocket Casts)/RSS, and refuse to patronize any podcast that doesn't publish an RSS url.

One only needs to peruse the comments of sites like this to quickly see that technically adept people aren't very smart in areas outside of their expertise, though they and others seem to believe otherwise.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=no+t...

"Funny"? De gustibus etc. But seriously, WTF is wrong with you moderators?

Google "no true Scotsman fallacy." Nevermind. Obviously a troller/intentional obfuscator.

- As has been pointed out _numerous_ times prior in these comments, identifying the release of Mr. Comey's personal memo as a 'leak' is misleadingly (and I think intentionally) implying that its release is illicit, which it is not. This is trollery and a clear intent to mislead, plain and simple.

- With regard to Mr. Snowden's comment, there is no rule against what Mr. Comey did, so his comment is stupid.

In what system of angular measurement are _leagues_ interchangeable with _degrees_? I am familiar with _leagues_ only as a linear unit, not an angular one.

You seem to be confused.

+1. Agree wholeheartedly. A sealed design greatly reduces the device's usable lifespan and is a horrible design approach for a rechargeable device for that reason.

I am a heavy user of a Galaxy Note 3, and I've bought several spare and replacement batteries since I got it. When I finally replace it, it will not be with another Samsung device; I'm switching over to the LG V line, which still employs a removable battery.

Who will be responsible for tracking how many times people have asked to be 'forgotten'? And does the one-Mulligan rule apply to each 'forgettable' incident, or do you only get one 'forget' overall, or is there some formula to be applied?

Even if people are making bad-faith requests just for the purpose of highlighting the flaws in the law/process, those flaws remain nonetheless.

I think he wasn't saying 'welfare blacks' and 'poor whites', but rather 'before welfare[,] blacks and poor whites'. So he wasn't expressing an equivalence between 'welfare blacks' and 'poor whites' but rather an equivalence between (all) blacks and 'poor whites'.