Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Unethical? What part? (Score 1) 104

Torturing the rioters? Is that a fact? Any fact that the torture and murder actually happened? How can you say something is immoral even when you don't know if it happened? Read the article again, you'd find carefully planted suggestive words, like "known". Known to whom? Where are the facts?

Comment Unethical? What part? (Score 1) 104

Riots happened. Laws were broken. Police needed information. Vodafone provided information. I didn't see anything unethical or unlawful on the company's conduct. Neither do I see any reason the company should have acted any differently if it were a Russian company doing business in the U.S or U.K How true is it that the riots were a result of food shortage? How true is it that the police has a record of human rights violation? Don't roll your eyes and say it's a given for a third world Arab country. Give evidence to show you aren't dishing out shit forced down your throat. But let's just pretend that it's all true, that the riots were the result of food shortage AND the Egyptian police does have a record of human rights violations. Does food shortage justify riots? Does a tainted human rights record automatically illegalize the authority out of the police to ask for cooperation for evidence?

Slashdot Top Deals

They are relatively good but absolutely terrible. -- Alan Kay, commenting on Apollos

Working...