Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Just what we need.... (Score 1) 320

Cars that will allow the US driving public to drive around completely asleep! Over 75% of the driving public drives around asleep at the wheel now! And the car makers keep adding "safety" features and alarms that try to keep those asleep from running over someone else. Is this really progress? We teaching folks that don't even have to be personally responsible even when they are piloting a 3,000 pound weapon!

Comment Is Hands-off driving supposed to be a good thing? (Score 1) 185

For my money , there are more than enough people driving that are totally obvious to their surroundings as things are! Now we are adding things to cars that let you sleep behind the wheel even more! The "Pullman" car was created for Trains, which had an Engineer driving it! Cars on Highways traveling at highway speeds should not be "Pullman" enabled. All these commercials about proximity systems and cameras that alert you to things in areas that you SHOULD be aware of, may be great backups to a driver doing what the driver of a 2 ton weapon should be doing. But these are being touted as "you no longer need to worry about it" enhancements. That is the wrong message. We should not be enabling even more obviousness while behind the wheel. So what happens if the sensors fail? You hit some other vehicle, do they go to the auto maker to get their repairs because the auto failed? Just another instance of our belief that none of us need to consider self-responsibility. Everything is always someone, or something else's fault. Geesh! When does this total lack of self-sufficiency stop?! I know the intention is safety, folks behind the wheel need to pay MORE attention to what they are doing, not less.

Comment Damned if you do and damned if you don't (Score 1) 117

If our Power grid a necessity? Of course, unless you really want to go back to the 1800s. But if you asked most Americans to live in that era they would die. Can the control of the grid be protected? Yes, but any control platform that you are not in the same room with, is vulnerable to someone gaining access to the controls. Can we protect against EMP? Yes, if we know exactly WHEN to turn of all the power to all devices in the EMP footprint area. Can we shield everything against EMP impact? Yes, but you don't want to pay for that TV, Radio, refrigerator, or microwave once it has been EMP hardened. And you probably don't even want to have to pick any one of these items up, unless you lift weights for a living. Can we protect against physical attacks on the grid? No. Too much of the hardware is exposed and accessible by the really determined. "Close" works in horseshoes and hand-grenades, and transmission towers that are leaving a distribution station. You don't have to fight your way in to blow up the station. Just go away from the distribution station a few miles and take down the towers, that will do exactly the same thing other than destroying the machinery with in the station. And if you do enough of those attacks you will ultimately bring the entire grid down for an extended period of time. Millions upon millions will die of exposure, starvation, dehydration, etc. And Millions will be killed in the fighting over what little electric power generation is left.

Comment Police as Criminals? (Score 1) 231

This is a case that should have cost Millions to settle. And there are at least a couple of Police officers that should not be receiving their pay or their pensions after they trampled all over the Laws they took an oath to protect. Some Municipalities have laws against taking officer's photos or filming them while they are performing their duty. Ocean City Maryland has such an ordinance. I was taking pictures of a sunset there and some officers were making an arrest between me and the sunset that I hadn't noticed. But they noticed me. I had to delete the photos that had them in them, or I had two options provided. Go to the Police station and be booked for breaking the ordinance, or give them my camera. I was trying to go to a family dinner, so I deleted the offending photos.

Comment What should we expect? (Score 1) 266

When the Leader of the US government uses any and every tool in the toolbox to find out anything and everything he can about US citizens so they can be attacked, at will. There are no individuals in this country that could survive a CIA or NSA witch-hunt. Every person has things they would not to become public knowledge. So, these agencies collect the ammunition to use against anyone that speaks up. What is confusing about that? If you are not concerned about what these agencies are doing at the behest of our Emperor, you should be. The administration has abridged any and all of our Laws that they don't care for, and failed to enforce others simply for their own purposes politically, to quash dissent. Have you noticed your Doctor or their staff are now asking you questions about your life-style they never used to ask? They have to provide this information to the US government under ObamaCare. If having the intelligence agencies digging up dirt on you, doesn't work they just consult your medical files for things to use against you. Of course this is all "For the Common Good". It isn't about the common good. It is about control. And information is the key to control.

Comment Why are we surprised? (Score 1) 667

The Russians aren't doing anything our current Administration hasn't done over and over and over again in the last 5+ years in communicating with the US population. Wait! When they reveal that the hard drives in the recovered Black boxes have all crashed and subsequently been destroyed, will their mimicry be complete.

Comment Criminals and driverless cars (Score 1) 435

Well, the biggest criminal in our country was creating a photo-op a few days ago in one, so I guess the title is appropriate. And if he drives like he Leads, he definitely needs a car he does not have to drive. And he will be the first to tell the population that everyone has to buy one for the good of all, or they will face a penalty, oops, no a tax. Wow! It is getting really hard to distinguish between those two isn't it? Our Emperor has already asked for a modification to the programming so that when the driverless car knows that a collision is unavoidable it will choose to collide with the Conservative and miss the Liberal.

Comment Who remembers the ice-breaker rescue? (Score 1) 784

Didn't we just have an episode where we had to send rescue vessels to the Antarctic to rescue vessels that had gotten trapped in too much ice? Oh, was that on the other side of Antarctica? So, the ice on one side is getting thicker and the ice on the other side is getting thinner? Sounds like a wash to me. We aren't the least bit worried about how our children and grandchildren will deal with the economy we are leaving to them. When did we get to be so arrogant? Even if the findings are correct. What can we (The US Public) do about it? Nothing. We do represent enough of a percentage of the world's population to have more than a minor effect on anything to do with the Climate or atmosphere. Our 10% cannot trump the other 90%. Are we really thinking that we need to do something about this just to set an example? Great example. No outcome, or benefit. OH! Let's go sink Billions into that fix! Or, let's just let everyone in the US pay a "Save the Planet tax" that will satisfy our Administration, briefly. It takes a lot to be this arrogant! (And stupid at the same time)!

Comment Wrong time to have a glitch. (Score 1) 765

Until your precise hand print is necessary for the gun to operate, there is no way to stop an assailant from using your own gun on you even with the proposed bracelet and RFID technology. All they have to do is get close enough to your wrist for the RFID to communicate, and voila' you are shot. If you are going to bring a gun into your home defense strategy you better be ready to use it with no hesitation. And if you truly feel you are being physically threatened, trying to make a disabling shot is asking to die yourself. If you think they are going to kill you, you better kill them first. Every statement, inference, and consideration regarding gun owner ship made by our Founding Fathers reflected their understanding that the only way to keep a Democratic Republic from becoming a dictatorship under the rule of the right individuals, is an armed populace. True, our current Administration wants to convert the United States into a Communist country solely under the control of the "Elitist" among that ruling body. Regardless of the rhetoric, if they are telling you they have any other agenda than dis-arming said Citizens Militia, they are lying to you, which is pretty much standard procedure for our current government. We already have Government agencies declaring the 1st Amendment no longer exists in this country. It only exists in the zones they establish as "Freedom of Speech Zones". Was anyone watching what the BLM was doing in Nevada? Nope, didn't think so.........

Comment Thinkers, Planners, Manipulators, and Hip shooters (Score 1) 769

Unfortunately our current Leadership has not shown itself to be very good at the first two, revels in the third, and has shot themselves in the foot with the fourth several times so far. Everyone wants to vilify the Energy giants for making money. And no one bothers to credit them for what they bring to the party. Let us take the hit on our Power Grid and everyone is going to find out just how much we rely on those Greedy Money-Mongers. Getting rid of coal is fully understandable from an Environmental standpoint. And the same is true of all fossil fuels. However, removing those fuels from our use needs to be tempered with replacing those fuel sources FIRST. Not after we have created a criminal element if you use fossil fuel. Solar, Wind, Ocean turbines, etc. are all viable resources. They just are not ready for prime time, and they are very expensive as a social experiment. This administration has tried to raise all fuel prices to make alternative resources more acceptable. They have artificially increased our costs whenever possible to push the public into accepting alternative fuel sources. Get the alternative working economically, and then get people to convert. The same is true of our Immigration debate. The current Administration, and the controlling party in the Senate wants Immigration reform in the form of Amnesty for one purpose only; to get the current illegals to vote for them. The 700 miles of new fences for Border Security as been approves and appropriated. And we can trust the idea that the Security fence will get "taken care of" just about as much as we could trust "If you like your Insurance you can keep it".

Comment Re:Militia, then vs now (Score 1) 1633

There is no confusion about what the Founder's intent was. They freely admitted that the governance they put together under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was because they saw, and understood human frailty. Then, as now, we are faced with a tyrant that believes that one man should govern without interference from the populace. That is the basis behind the 2nd Amendment. If the person living in the White House believes he should control all aspects of life in the US, he is acting in the same manner as King George. No one Man should hold that power, and the Founder's recognized that fact very clearly, and prepared for that eventuality as well as others they envisioned.

Comment Re:Deniers (Score 1) 869

If we would all just stop breathing the climate change problem would most likely go away. There is no way we can erase the impact that humanity has on "Nature", and more than the presence oh any species will have on its natural surroundings. To accept our impact and try to reduce that impact is laudable, But, to think that we can remove our thumbprint, and "save Nature" is beyond arrogant. It is blatantly stupid. But then all those that think they have to change everything they can see are beyond stupid. There is nothing ignorant about believing that Mother Nature can take care of herself. If we were so dam smart, we wouldn't have the mid-section of the country returning to a dust-bowl. And we wouldn't have areas of the West with no water resources, and no way to get any.

Comment Re:Did past people hunt in a sustainable manner? (Score 1) 180

At the end of the day, human beings are just another species of animal that inhabits this planet. And just like any other animal that is able to feed itself and procreate we DO over-populate our geographic areas. We ARE like a virus. We take over the space we inhabit, and will continue to inhabit that space until it can no longer sustain our population numbers. Then we expand to encompass new territories for consumption. We only rule our domains because we have better weapons than the other predators that may want to inhabit the same domain. And all the prey has ever done when faced with a predator is run and hide, and hope the predator doesn't find them. That is what most wildlife does around humans. I particularly like the statement we are mostly all somewhat guilty of promoting assassination with intent to ingest.

Comment Of course we have a STEM worker shortage (Score 1) 491

The culprit is our educational system, and its failure to provide one simple aspect of the learning environment; "Common Sense". I grew up when schools just taught the 3 "Rs'. By the mid-to-late 70s I noticed a change in the work force coming into the market place. What I noticed was that Common Sense was not common anymore. People did not reason things out. They could spout all sorts of technical information, but that was all it was. They were regurgitating data they had learned, but that learning experience did not provide the leap between the data and reality. That was the beginning of the tech process of replace, do not troubleshoot to repair. Once our technologists became swappers instead of troubleshooters, it was all downhill from there. Today, it has gotten so bad that schools no longer teach life. What they teach now is a political agenda. When was the last time you saw a politician that even knew which end of a screwdriver you were supposed to hold? Nope, common sense isn't common anymore. I personally think it has a lot to do with a total lack of self-responsibility, coupled with laziness. When I achieved my certifications; (CCNA, CCNP, CCVP, and CCSI) it took months of study to be prepared for a single exam, and most certs required more than a handful of exams to achieve any one of the above. Today, there are exam professionals that will provide all the answers for any given exam. Yes, you can regurgitate the answers to specific questions, but do you actually KNOW the technology from a hands-on standpoint? No. So, anyone willing to pay money for the exams can get the certifications. Do they actually have the knowledge required to act as a subject matter expert in the technology? The answer is usually no.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember, even if you win the rat race -- you're still a rat.

Working...