Re: Descartes might have said... (Score 1)

"In Googlis non est, ergo non est."

Pie Jesu! You cannot render your thoughts into simple Latin? What is the modern education coming to, then?

Nice try, but the transferendum was "if it is not on Google, it doesn't exist", so we've got to use a conditional! Luckily, though, this looks like the causal-relationship kind of if-then relationship, so it's relatively simple to make it right--no need for subjunctives or whatnot. Also, "in Googlis" is an ablative plural of a first or second declension noun, while "google, googlis, N" is clearly third declension. Sententia desiderata est "si in Googli non est, non est."