Comment Re:That's a people name (Score 1) 10
Comment Re:They won't sell (Score 1) 25
Comment Goodbye, middle class (Score 3, Insightful) 49
Comment Re:Great (Score 2) 67
Comment In Soviet Russia... (Score 2) 30
Comment Re:Boondoggle (Score 3, Informative) 114
Comment Seems like I've heard this explanation elsewhere (Score 1) 32
Comment Re:USA did not achieve a military victory over USS (Score 2) 114
Comment Re:actually secure your domain ? (Score 1) 167
Comment Re:Sniff Test (Score 1) 190
You absolutely cannot build a fission bomb with uranium enriched to only 20% without further enrichment. I don't know who's saying that but they're full of shit. You need uranium enriched to 80% at a minimum and even that requires a very clever bomb design and exotic neutron sources to supplement the uranium. Most uranium bombs require 90-95% enrichment to work and even then resist miniaturization.
This paper isn't actually about US SMRs. It's a stalking horse for claiming that the Iranian nuclear program, which halts enrichment of uranium at 20%, is a proliferation risk in its current form rather than requiring significant re-enrichment of its stocks that would be rather easily detectable under the framework of the 2014 E3+3 deal.
Except... Iran hasn't halted uranium enrichment at 20%. Try 60%. Source: International Atomic Energy Agency report dated 26 Dec 2023. "In a Dec. 26 report, the IAEA noted that Iran is now producing approximately nine kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent uranium-235 per month. Iran was producing 60 percent enriched U-235 at a similar rate in early 2023, but decreased production by about two-thirds in June. (See ACT, October 2023.) Accelerating the production of uranium enriched to 60 percent U-235 is concerning because the material can be quickly enriched to weapons-grade levels or 90 percent." https://www.armscontrol.org/ac...) If you really believe Iran is only pursuing "peaceful nuclear energy solutions" I have a bridge to sell you, as well as some swamp land in Florida.