Damn straight...What crack are you smoking? (Score 1)

I could ask you the same question, but thats not the issue. the guns were obviosly readily available. Geez, look at most countries where gun control is much more rigid and you will see there is a difference. Personally I live in Norway (thats Scandinavia for those of you who didn't know) and all though there are more people in the states than there is in the whole of Scandinavia, there are a lot less guns per inhabitant. And belive me, these things don't happen as often here. In Norway, even the cops don't wear guns normaly (they still train with guns, and they are used, but they don't normaly wear'em). This is because of the theory that if the means are drastic, so will the response be. If the cops have guns so will the criminals and vice versa. It's an evil spiral.
This might not have saved the children that were killed, they might still have used som other means of killing, but you shouldn't ignore the fact that you guys need a debate about gun controll in you country, or it just might get worse..

(Pardon my english)