Where is an actual review? (Score 1)

From the 'review': 'What follows is not a comprehensive examination of the information contained in the text (which would require more text than EE itself), but rather a summary of the history and politics that make the book significant, and my own perspective as a biologist on how that context produced a text that's wildly inappropriate for use in a science classroom.' Why do you say 'a review shows it to be chock full of bad science and questionable reasoning', in light of the above admission that the reviewer isn't even actually reviewing the book?