Thats a aloe and you know it.

You are the one that said: “There are bigger points.” Why do you lie so much?

None of these points have anything to do with what he said. You are introducing strawman arguments.

How does jobs in China or Vietnam create jobs in the US again? You seem to missed the whole part that where I said: " Not much difference when it comes to US jobs assembling those phones."

Maybe not as painful Intel x86 on TSMC silicon which happened last year.

But poster's point is still valid. Making the chips here only to ship them overseas for the device to be assembled. The only difference is assembled in Vietnam or India instead of China. Not much difference when it comes to US jobs assembling those phones.

As someone who has a Windows laptop with touch, I don’t have much use for touch. Even though Windows started to incorporate more touch beginning with Windows 8, many things are still mouse and keyboard driven. For example, many sites I use still rely on mouse over features or have very small control elements that are not touch friendly. With more applications becoming cloud based, it is more likely I will not use touch

Bahahaha. Why don’t you ask Iran? You really are clueless aren’t you?

You wrote; "Show evidence." And I gave that to you. Now you are complaining I didn't give you all the evidence that you never asked for.

I wrote " It seems pretty clear they did not BUILD their own power plant." No one is complaining that these data centers did not plan to USE electricity. That is either dishonest or idiotic.

The Iran situation has nothing to do with MAD. A key component of MAD is "mutually assured" part. When MAD was the strategy between the USSR and the US, both sides collectively had tens of thousands of warheads. At best, Iran might have the ability to produce a few nukes if they had the uranium.

The part you missed or trying to deflect is the part where Iran DOES NOT have nukes at the moment as it is not clear if they have the required enriched uranium and capability.

"Here's a thought experiment: Will you go to any lengths to excuse Trump of things we know he did?" Still going to any lengths to defend Trump.

Bahahahahah. I wrote about no bid contracts. You tried to pivot to how every past President was also bad. Then you tried to speak abou WMDs. Still nothing about no bid contracts.

You: I DEMAND answers to everything while I am not going to address any of your points by trying to change the subject. Buddy, no one owes you anything..

You know we can scroll up, right? You wrote: "I find it absolutely hilarious when so many piss-poor plebeians like you say that others are morons." Leaving out that part where you took offense is dishonest nd you know it. Now, you are trying to lie about wrote you wrote.

How would you know? You don't do you? That is just your attempt to insult me for calling you out by insinuating English is not my native language. But to my point you have yet to actually address a single point of his.

And no one talked about WMDs either. How about you trying to continuously change the subject?

Not sure what you are talking about I would guess it has nothing do with the topic on hand. Every post of yours is just another example of you trying excuse everything Trump does that was predicted.

It doesn't take a genius to realize if Micron makes lots of HBM instead of DDR5 in the next year and the HBM demand suddenly disappears, Micron is stuck with lots of product that will not sell at the same time not having product like DDR5 that would have sold.

His insults were towards Micron, not you. But you took offense at that and instead of addressing any of his points, you started insulting him.

[sarcasm]Yes because these days we have tubes to take people everywhere where cars are not.[/sarcasm]

And no one said every past president was an angel. No one. It is just more denialism to excuse everything he’s done.

Classic whataboutism. When I mention no bid contracts you start talking about past loans. Those are not the same. It is simple deflection.