You get what you pay for. "using civilian-grade materials and widely available commercial parts, along with simpler manufacturing methods like die-casting" I'm sure these will work reliably. Why didn't lockheed martin think of that?
If you can make 100 missiles with civilian grade materials for a price of 1 missile with military grade materials, then the choice is obvious. Even with failure rate of 50 percent that would mean a total overload of any missile interception system. Just launch them in 100 batches. Especially when launch subsystem is not an issue too.
You're absolutely right - gas engines aren't necessary, and frankly they're silly.
Unless you don't have a garage on hour house, live in a house built before 1980, or live in an apartment. Then you're SOL. There's no infrastructure for you to have an EV.
Excuse me, but since when apartments have a build in petrol/diesel station? So "no infrastructure to have ICE" too.
Reality check: Petrol/gasolene cars produce very little NOx. It is mostly a diesel engine problem and EVs mostly replace petrol/gasoline cars.
Reality check: an old clunker, bought for 1500-3000$ that still runs from the last century, has no catalytic converter anymore and nobody will bother to replace it... You might be surprised what emissions are for those engines. And if it does have a turbine, then NOx emissions skyrockets.
Public transportation just isn't practical in a huge mostly-rural country. Sure, you can create public transit in urban/suburban areas. People who feel so inclined are free to use those options. They are typically poorly managed, dirty, crime ridden, and not particularly popular with people who have no other option than to consume those services.
I can see how it is much easier to implement in smaller countries with significantly higher concentrations of people in smaller areas.
And that is explicitly what is meant by "ending car dependency". Have the viable alternative to the car. If public transport is usable, then why drive car? I agree that it might not be feasible for rural regions with 1 person per sq.m. But for more densely populated rural regions it is a viable solution. But it requires investment and proper city planning, which sucks in US/Canada, where everything is designed to be only usable by car.
When I was young or a young adult, both the young and the old were copying music and videos (reel-to-reel or cassette tapes, VHS cassettes) for personal use among friends and the wider family all day long. Actually, in many jurisdictions, like the one where I grew up right in the middle of capitalist Europe, it was perfectly legal, too. And what do you know – movies and music records and concerts kept coming in nonetheless. Because, by tendency, many of those who were the biggest sharers were also the biggest buyers. There also were sensible flat surcharges on tapes and cassettes and recording equipment which were distributed among artists.
Anyway, I also seriously question today's movie industry. Can any movie be worth hundreds of millions of dollars? Are hundreds of millions of dollars, the least of which, by the way, find their way to the ground personnel in such productions, well spent in making a movie, of all things? I, for one, don't think so.
No it wasn't legal at any time. It was just not enforced heavily as people were still buying records and it required physical interaction to make EACH copy. However when digital copying became possible, record industry became really scared.
"2025 mileage rates Self-employed and business: 70 cents/mile"
??? Does that include all the car maintenance and insurance. But still that is almost 2x more expensive than using car sharing service around here, which provides cars for rent for prices from 25 cents/km. And this is in Europe, where fuel is 1.5-2 €/l.
And if that's just fuel, than it is insane... I am paying 5-10 ct/km for my current PHEV, which is quite thirsty for fuel.
Boeing is at the very least a complete joke when it comes to quality/safety these days, so that's clearly a lesson that could have been learned and wasn't. I'd sooner fly on a decommissioned Tupolev.
Which almost always is a copy US or German plane. Usually bad copy.
Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket. -- George Orwell