This is a shitty argument. Individual games on Roblox associate save data to your account and is non-transferable. I used to play Roblox way more when I was a teen, but if someone deleted my whole account, then I'd be pretty pissed too. Not because I lost any valuable items or anything mind you (I don't have any). I'd be pissed because I have just lost hundreds if not thousands of hours worth of play time on many games.

If I went up to someone playing any game they enjoy (online or offline) and just wiped all their progress and achievements, they'd almost certainly be quite pissed at me. That argument of "It's clearly not a fun game if they get pissed at you" doesn't work, especially with games that are designed around gradually building up progress like Factorio or Cities: Skylines.

The micro-transaction and market place of items is a very valid point against Roblox and I agree its extremely predatory. I also think that children are not being regulated on screen time as well as they should be. There are so many other ways you could have elaborated on that point.

While the processors are dogshit yes, they are modern architectures that provide better efficiency and a modern GPU that can provide good hardware acceleration. You are unlikely to find either of those things on a 32-bit system, which will make browsing the internet with it painfully slow.

I've seen many different EVs in my area during winter, they are perfectly fine. This is a solved issue.

How is ADB easier? Every Android device I've ever sideloaded on is as simple as opening the .apk file in a file browser, tapping install on the confirmation popup, and that's it.

Ok, but who's going to pay for that basic income in an economy where there is zero human involvement? It would just end up being: Money dumped into corporate pockets -> they pay nothing back into the economy because they automated everything -> government has to print more money because there isn't enough income to pay for UBI -> hyperinflation -> economic disaster. I'm not trying to say UBI is bad, if used correctly it can be very beneficial, the problem is that for it to work there needs to be a solid stream of money moving through the economy and the government. This outcome would have very little movement of money so it would be a shitshow.

Once every single job has been replaced and every single human is completely out of work, what do we do? How is society supposed to continue to function? Are we going to have some kind of massive revolution where we abolish currency or something?

I think trying to ban all advertising is useless. I think a ban of paid and targeted advertising would be great though. Online advertising would be gone almost entirely, but a sign on the side of a highway exit listing common/popular destinations at that exit would not be considered an issue. Any issues with real-world advertisements could be covered with additional regulation that specifically lists types of physical advertisements that are not allowed, such as roadside billboards or posters at a bus stop.

I tried using a Mac from my TV recently. The only way to make the interface larger so that I can comfortably read it from a distance is to turn down the resolution. Why????? There is a hacky way to force the TV as a retina display, but MacOS just 2x scales the whole interface on retina displays which is way too big for my TV's lower resolution. Both Windows and most Linux desktops have true fractional scaling, in fact Windows high DPI scaling has gotten quite decent recently. When I set my scaling to 125% in Windows on a 1080p monitor, it doesn't just set the resolution to 900p or something, it actually scales up the size of UI elements to make the interface bigger. Yes, some programs don't understand high DPI scaling and become blurry, but day to day I rarely encounter any software with this issue. All of my most frequently used programs handle high DPI displays just fine. MacOS appears to have no equivalent to this behaviour. Even with a retina display, the interface scaling options are just changing the resolution of the display. They just don't label it as such. Unless you leave the scaling at default, everything becomes a bit softer and blurrier whenever you use any scaling options on MacOS and it sucks.

You're missing a big point: people ALREADY have to do this. If you compare the amount of time spent in a car (usually 5-6 hours), or traveling on VIA rail (similar to by car), or a commuter flight including the time spent in the airports at both sides, then this will be the fastest way to get between the two cities. Also, say it's a 4 hour trip total, board a train at 10 am in the morning and be in Montreal by 2 PM. Plenty of time still left in the day even with a longer travel time. Also, trains are a lot more comfortable. No need to worry about turbulence or having to shouting over the noise of the engines to talk to the person beside you. And unlike a car, you can get up and walk around at any time so you don't destroy your legs.

A little fishy...

This is a good idea, but you forget that government bureaucracy would result in this process lasting until the heat death of the universe.

They know what it's good at (spam and non-consensual porn) but they just don't mention those.

The mouse is part of the price of most desktop macs, so you have to buy it. If I am being forced to buy that mouse I'd at least hope it's good.

Just because that's how they want you to use it does not make it good design. It's stupid design, especially since you don't know when it will run out of battery until it abruptly does in the middle of work. Being told not to use your mouse when you actively want to use it is very dumb.

if only this scam would be irradiated and die off like those guys who fucked around and found out with a sphere the last time