Comment Re:Fixed that for ya.... (Score 1) 405
Comment Re:Statistics! (Score 1) 1142
Yes, but if you can't communicate your results, what good are they to the rest of us?
I voted for communication because the state of science journalism compelled me to.
Comment Re:Quis ipsos custodiet custodes? (Score 1) 697
>>>The very reason we HAVE a SCOTUS is to protect the individuals from majority abuse.
But the SCOTUS is part of the U.S. Government. It often acts like a rubberstamp for the Congress and the Executive branches, and when it doesn't rubberstamp, then the president sometimes threatens the court (see FDR and the Court-packing Scandal).
The U.S. Government should not be self-policing itself. That's why it's necessary to have an independent party, i.e. the States, be granted the ability to nullify unconstitutional laws. They created the Constitution - they ought to have at least some power to enforce it and nullify unconstitutional laws - just like any other binding contract.
Submission + - Remus: Xen gets transparent high availability. (cs.ubc.ca)
Submission + - Metasploit Project Sold (darkreading.com)
Submission + - Schneier: We need better un-authentication (threatpost.com)
Comment Re:Running out of cats? (Score 5, Funny) 647
Submission + - Does powerline networking nuke radio hams? (pcpro.co.uk)
Comment SAS 70 (Score 1) 480
Comment Re:Apple vs. Microsof (Score 1) 475
Comment Re:Profits, but for whom? (Score 1) 624
Comment Re:Since this probably won't get posted. (Score 1) 2
Comment MX Revolution (Score 1) 1