As a lifelong DEM with a heavy science background, I sincerely ask how my party became eager to (1) turn their private health details over to the government (2) willing to let that government grant or remove privileges based upon it?

Remember the term "Emergency Use Authorization" ??? What society would attempt to FORCE or SHAME or COERCE every member to take the jab when (1) the pharma company is immune from prosecution (2) the person who administers the jab is likewise immune (3) the business that was contracted to manufacture the vaccine is likewise immune (4) and people like you who would attempt to force vaccinate are immune!

So you're OK with EUA after following Moderna's clinical trial participants for a WHOLE 9 WEEKS after the second jab of gene therapy? We the citizens beg to differ!

You're going round in circles avoiding the actual point that I was attempting to make. Where did the local vs national news stuff come from -- not from me.

Talk to Fauci, talk to Hotez, and talk to any of dozens of equally qualified, equally educated, equally well informed experts WHO DO NOT present the same viewpoint as Fauci and Hotez. Not a difficult concept, which in fact happens on most other topics!

PBS News Hour hammers away each evening "go get your vaccination" and "let's talk with the vaccine hesitant who came around", NEITHER OF WHICH is News. Could it be that the prominent sponsorship of Johnson & Johnson, or of the Gates Foundation, would be endangered if at least 2 views were presented?

"Who else do you want on? Some equal-time anti-vax b-list celeb?" That's what you call science? Attacking and distorting the messenger's message? I wrote " There are literally DOZENS of equally qualified authorities who are never invited on," --- did you honestly misread it?

Yet again you write "what do you mean they're not allowed when everyone has heard them loud and clear from the anti science people?" when my post was about SCIENCE, that doesn't happen to fit the narrative, offered by highly qualified professionals, and is attacked by PharmaBots relentlessly.

Your post might have value if it pointed out actual "mistaken" beliefs, and how you determined with certainty that they were mistaken.

"Those alternative narratives as you note, are simply wrong". There's a good starting point for listing those "alternative narratives" and your research...

As a lifelong Dem, highly suspicious of all things Trumpian, I've gone past the first pages of search results, using my extensive science background, and --- found many sound, science-backed, cracks in the media vaccine wall.

Watch the first 90 sec of this 10 min video by Moderna boss Tal Zaks from 2017 ("hacking the software of life"), and ask whether you're comfortable injecting their concoction into billions of arms after following volunteers for 9 weeks after their second dose? Incidentally, Moderna is exempted from liability, as is the person who injects it. Plus, there is no provision for undoing what the mRNA does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

How did vaccination turn into religion, with the faithful calling for burning the heretics at the stake?

The evening news has two authorities, Dr. Anthony Fauci & Dr. Peter Hotez, who represent the establishment. There are literally DOZENS of equally qualified authorities who are never invited on, as they would point out the weak points in the hasty approval process, the government favoritism, the injuries documented in the Vaccine Injury Compensation database, using SCIENCE --- not religion.

Here's a DailyKos dot com warning to a post of mine with actual quotes from a freely available, 100% authentic Ted Talk by Tal Zaks of Moderna:

"I will leave it to others to decide whether this counts as an anti-vaxx post or not."

What other topic is not even allowed a single dissenting opinion??? We only have two Gods named Fauci and Hotez --- thou shalt quote no heretics!

I'm waiting also, as a lifelong Democrat whose entire background is in the sciences. Two months of testing mRNA by a gene therapy company, rebranding it as "vaccine", and injecting billions of eager people? Who is willing to invest just one minute to watch the start of a 2017 Ted Talk by Tal Zaks of Moderna describe mRNA therapy as "hacking the software of life"??? Remember that their company, and the person who injects their product, manufactured by Moderna or a sub contractor, are ALL fully shielded from lawsuits. Leaving what besides profit motive? Pride?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Hundreds of published studies thoroughly document the "non-thermal" effects of 3G and 4G on humans.

Five representatives of the telco industry told Sen Blumenthal in hearing that they had NO studies demonstrating the safety of 5G, nor did they have a budget for such studies.

Would any of us risk DNA damage, calcium channel disruption, or damage to the blood-brain barrier in return for faster download speeds?

https://bioinitiative.org/rese...
https://ehtrust.org/key-issues...
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/...