Well, that one guy did not detect any problems, did he? Because the problem was only detected when the supermarkets opened in the morning. So what good is this monitoring anyway?

And as multiple people have said: monitoring is one thing. Controlling is another. Why do you need to control a refrigirator that is set to -18 C. And why does that refrigirator have the ability to heat up to 50 C?

So many stupid decisions and red flags here, it is almost a good thing they got hacked so they have to rethink their security.

And a judge will never rule on that. This is basically a frivolous lawsuit.

beginning with a forced eating challenge in which one employee had to consume a dead tarantula

First boss of mine that is forcing me to do that kind of shit is probably suing me for assault. On him.

Well, when I look at the sample image in the linked article, then you have to agree that this is a bad decision. I mean: information in the image is missing. A person in the background is gone. How you can justifiy that with other dubious enhancements escapes me. And yes, the other enhancements are dubious. Sure, the whole picture is brighter (but is that better?), the street lamp is dimmer, the CIGARS banner has a bow in it.
It is not the image that it was, therefore you have to conclude it is not a good enhancement. And maybe the masses are indiscriminate, but to give everyone Soylent Green because most people wouldn't object is not the way forward.

Because I've never seen Linux computers bomb so much. They have the same hardware, but they don't stop working. So is it a software problem or a hardware problem? Does he not understand kernel levels?
I fear Linux is getting a little soft in the head. Maybe he needs to revisit his discussion with Andy.

Tough cookies. Don't be obnoxious and you won't have your camera/glasses broken.
The problem is there are too many obnoxious people doing this for their own stupid little channel. And nobody wants to be acting in it. Stop it or face the consequences.

That's the problem with all these streaming platforms that want a piece of the pie.
The pie used to cost $ 10. Then the pie cost $ 15. Soon after you neede to pay $15 dollar to get half a pie and spend another $15 to get the other half. Now you get only a small piece of the pie for $ 20 and you need to buy the other 10 pieces for another $ 5-$ 25 each.

And the wonder why it doesn't work.

It's the same as 22 people kicking a ball. Or two people hitting a ball at eachother.
I suppose you are not interested in watching anything? Or my I respectfully ask why you are interested in #something?

Yes, there were concerns that technology would leak away. It was feared that the company would be transferred out of the Netherlands and that "crucial technological knowledge and capacities could be lost". According to the minister of Economic Affairs:

"Recent heb ik ernstige en acute signalen gekregen dat er bij het bedrijf ernstige tekortkomingen zijn die de leveringszekerheid in gevaar kunnen brengen. Dat zou grote gevolgen hebben voor de Europese en Nederlandse economie. Op basis van de signalen die ik heb gekregen had ik in mijn ogen geen andere keuze dan in te grijpen via deze wet."

And ordered continued production in Nijmegen.

Do you honestly think they have those many billions in the bank? The rest of your post also show you have 0 idea of how a business works. And where does entitlement even come into play?

That's not what you said, you say "hasn't cost them anything". That's wrong. Not making cars still costs them money.
You are also misrepresenting the article. It says "costing 30.000 vehicles". That is a normal phrase for something you can't make even when it does not directly mean monetary value.

You are nitpicking something that needs not be nitpicked.

You still have to pay the workers (no, you can't send them on unpaid leave), pay electricity, there is the hidden cost of amortizations that continue without revenue.
To say that stopping production also stops spending shows a complete lack of understanding of even the basics of manufacturing.

What merit has this remark? Just because this group of candidates has no dark skinned people, what is it that you are suggesting?
I'm sure there were many black skinned qualified applicants. Just not more qualified than these 10 people.

I also don't mind paying for content. I do mind having to pay 10 streaming services full price to be able to see what I want. I do mind paying 25 euro per month for my usual subscription and then having to pay 15 euro EXTRA because the broadcast rights #something I watch has been bought by some other higher bidder.
In that sense, all measure of reasonability has gone. It is greed, greed, greed and how can we extract the last cent from our viewers.
And I don't go along with that game. I don't NEED to watch TV. If you don't offer something reasonable, more and more viewers will switch off.

Downvote and report the videos is the only option available to me and I am using them. No idea if this actually does something. I'm 99% sure these reports are being handled by AI.