No doubt people will jump on with complaints around wokeness, however the series has always had diversity and inclusion as part of its DNA. The show is of course much more than those alone.

Where the show excels is when it keeps these things in harmony with good sci-fi story lines, strong characters and ideas that show what is possible by working together, using reason over force by default, and building for a better tomorrow.

Thanks to Mr. Roddenberry, and all those involved over the years to make Trek great. Livelong and prosper!

I saw the film with the family yesterday. It was okay, but not great. If you are fan of space, you should enjoy the indirect behind the scenes footage in addition to the large scale "Deep sky" images. My daughter, 12, found it awe inspiring as she already naturally has an interest in space. The 9 year old was entertained for the short 40 minutes, but not much else. We paid $8 each.

While there was nothing that I didn't enjoy, there was far to little actual science in the film for my liking. This film is very accessible to audiences, but I feel at the cost of making the magnitude of the accomplishment and implications truly understood. This lack of substance is why I suggest the film to be just "okay". While I'm happy to see something of science carried in wide distribution (if only for a week), it is disappointing that more of an effort into explaining the science was not made. Simple things like finding ways to visualize the scale of the universe were omitted and instead addressed with a voice-over explaining "there are a lot of planets". Lack of effort in visualizing something like this pass on a chance to land a observable truth with audiences that would leave a lasting impression, etc.

The film comprises of many interviews of various participants in the project, a voice over from Michelle Williams, earth-side footage in addition to space based CGI and of course JWST images. Very little history is provided on the project's background and challenging execution. No history on James Webb. Film appears to be largely funded by Northrop Grumman.

Not always perfect, but happy to see that Mozilla tries to do stay true to their values.

1. Dell is now a private company, so no need to worry about public shareholders anymore. 2. Swanson is not Dell's CEO, he is head of software.

Alternate translation: Let's turn these off and encourage millions of users to buy the WiiU.

1/3? They lost 1 million of about 22 million.

You have not run into me on the subway. :P But point taken, people think I'm a nerd.

I find it cute that you believe you have privacy as it is.

Just realize that the n810 can only accept up to a 8GB card; 16GB will not work.

If the user has limited uses for the scope, what a good analysis will show that is most low end scopes are OEMed anyway therefore likely to be nearly identical to one another. (That is, a CM, or contract manufacturer, is making the scope for Tek or NI, etc.)

When approaching the high end, scope manufacturers do begin to differentiate from one another, but it looks like this buyer is not informed enough to enable the SD community to truly assist.

I will add that one more important thing to consider is if there are desires for long term service, because those companies do offer substantial difference in customer service levels.

Final add: Agilent is successor to HP, so will find many of the same features and similar setups in an Agilent scope if you are used to HP.