Comment Re: Computers uses newer chips, film at 11 (Score 1) 47
Comment Re: Cut lives saving USAID and spread job killing (Score 2) 49
Also now the money is being spent on Russel Voughts personal security detail/concierge service. Do you truly think thats a better us than helping people eat?
Comment Re: I just don't see the pendant.. (Score 1) 34
Comment Re: Somebody isn't aware of ThinkGeek (Score 1) 41
Comment Re: Really? (Score 1) 57
Comment The only reason... (Score 1) 65
Comment Ugh (Score 2) 20
Comment Re:Tax Increases Inbound (Score 4, Informative) 57
1) the public pension basically the same as the average social security check in the US but there's also universal healthcare, which is the overwhelming cost problem for most American seniors, and better renter protections which is the other major problem for American seniors
2) it's in *addition* to mandatory employer paid pensions for most folks
so, in reality, a lot more bang for their buck than here for that 45%
Comment Re:The question is... (Score 2, Insightful) 361
What does *he* envision a hypothetical scenario where AI has taken over an extremely large amount of the labor?
I'll grant that it is an *unlikely* scenario, but should it come to pass that we manage huge reductions in the need for human labor, and large chunks of the population pretty much have to 'stop working' whether they like it or not, what does he imagine the outcome?
Make an argument that AI isn't going to be *that* game changing, sure. But I really dislike the argument that humans don't deserve to get by unless they are somehow needed for work. Everyone do their part, but if there aren't as many parts to be done...
Particularly rich from a spoiled guy who hasn't had to *really* work a day of his life...
Probably for everyone not rich or in a job to service the rich that AI cant do to "die and decrease the surface population"