Comment Re:False (Score 1) 398
It seems pretty clear to me after reading the thread including http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00 757.html -- Gervase says in that message that the whole thread is about using the trademark without the official logo. Did you miss that thread?
Now, the Mozilla Corporation is coming back a year later and invalidating that agreement. Debian isn't likely to try any "legal fight" to keep the name Firefox; if no agreement can be reached, they'll just rename everything and be done with it. But trying to claim they never had permission (or only "weak"ly had permission) is misstating the case.
Now, the Mozilla Corporation is coming back a year later and invalidating that agreement. Debian isn't likely to try any "legal fight" to keep the name Firefox; if no agreement can be reached, they'll just rename everything and be done with it. But trying to claim they never had permission (or only "weak"ly had permission) is misstating the case.
