Submission + - MIT Professor questions CO2 causing Climate change
Amigan writes: Richard Lindzen (Prof Emeritus MIT) and William Happer (Prof Emeritus Princeton) have published a paper entitled "Physics Demonstrates that increasing Greenhouse Gases cannot cause dangerous warming, extreme weather or any harm"
In the paper they point out that scientific evidence concerning GHG is ignored, while opinion is substituted for science. They also point out how/why Net Zero is a flawed policy.
"It is astounding that one of the most complex questions in physics (namely, the behavior of a multi-phase, radiatively active, turbulent fluid) should be labeled by the government — and funding agencies it controls — to be so settled that skeptics are silenced. The models supporting the climate-crisis narrative make predictions that utterly fail to match the observations of what they purport to predict. This failure means in science they should never be used. Unfortunately, this peculiar situation is particularly dangerous because many world leaders have abandoned the science and intellectual rigor bequeathed to us by the Enlightenment and its forebears.
Thus, the scientific method is very simple and very profound.
Does the theory work with observations? If not, it is rejected and not used."
In the paper they point out that scientific evidence concerning GHG is ignored, while opinion is substituted for science. They also point out how/why Net Zero is a flawed policy.
"It is astounding that one of the most complex questions in physics (namely, the behavior of a multi-phase, radiatively active, turbulent fluid) should be labeled by the government — and funding agencies it controls — to be so settled that skeptics are silenced. The models supporting the climate-crisis narrative make predictions that utterly fail to match the observations of what they purport to predict. This failure means in science they should never be used. Unfortunately, this peculiar situation is particularly dangerous because many world leaders have abandoned the science and intellectual rigor bequeathed to us by the Enlightenment and its forebears.
Thus, the scientific method is very simple and very profound.
Does the theory work with observations? If not, it is rejected and not used."
