There seems to be a recurring straw man on this thread. I'm not sure where the WSJ article claims that science 'proves' the existence of God. It is not coming to a strict scientific conclusion,but a logical and reasonable conclusion based on legitimate current scientific observations of the universe. That is in no way a claim that science has proved Gods existence,but that scientific discoveries,based on the current data,logically point to the truth of a First Cause,a Creator, God (despite modern expectations). Science on its own, cannot prove God exists,nor disprove it,it is too limited in its scope. It limits itself to the material. Its very method of proof depends on this limit. Science narrows its scope in order to work,in order to make conclusions that can be proved and falsifiable theories. Without this limit,science is no longer science. The WSJ article makes a broader logical observation.

There seems to be a recurring straw man on this thread. I'm not sure where the WSJ article claims that science 'proves' the existence of God. It is not coming to a strict scientific conclusion,but a logical and reasonable conclusion based on legitimate current scientific observations of the universe. That is in no way a claim that science has proved Gods existence,but that scientific discoveries,based on the current data,logically point to the truth of a First Cause,a Creator, God (despite modern expectations). Science on its own, cannot prove God exists,nor disprove it,it is too limited in its scope. It limits itself to the material. Its very method of proof depends on this limit.