Comment Re:An outbreak of sanity? (Score 1) 1367
Comment Points 66 and 67 of the judgement (Score 1) 657
67.On the second point, the collection of other similar works relied on by the defendants have worked against them because the collection has served to emphasise how different ostensibly independent expressions of the same idea actually look.
They are key and paint the case in a far different light from the scare mongering sensationalist headlines that have been produced about the case.
Comment More open standards (Score 1) 507
Comment Re:FOSS attitude fail. (Score 2) 158
They change here is that project leadership will now be shared between Adobe and an Open Source foundation.
Comment Re:Be wary of taxes that billionaires want (Score 1) 694
Comment Re:Be wary of taxes that billionaires want (Score 1) 694
Comment Re:Flash Professional is $700 (Score 1) 354
Comment Re:Adobe dev tools cost too much (Score 1) 354
The Flex SDK is completely free and open source.
Comment Re:New performance metric. (Score 1) 524
Comment Re:New performance metric. (Score 1) 524
Comment A National Inquiry should work (Score 1) 440
They are the worlds worst bully, they fold like a pack of cards every time.
Comment Re:This is why we can't have anything nice (Score 3, Informative) 364
Comment So unbelievably stupid (Score 1) 364
This is going to go down with the "why yes it is definitely better for the consumer if Apple bans cross compilers no I;ll keep my mouth shut once Apple reverse that decision a couple of months later".
It is close to impossible to describe the blatant hypocrisy of railing against Lodsys (which Daring Fireball has done) but then criticising Google's position on patents as being monopolistic and anti-competitive.
Breathtaking.