For the first time in many years, I agree that
/. ain't what it used to be.
I'm afraid I have to agree. The misleading article summaries are bad enough, ranging from being irrelevant to actually implying the opposite of what the articles in question say, but I find it hard to believe the Slashdot editors would really believe the sort of claptrap written in this article. I think the sad reality is that they know it's drivel, but also that it will generate traffic, especially from the nutter contingent, and this, in my view, reflects poorly on their integrity.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. - Andy Finkel, computer guy