Comment Re:There's a better design out there.... (Score 1) 203
Comment Re:It'll be interesting (Score 2) 21
Comment Re:Idiocy (Score 1) 28
This post doesn't even remotely border or anything resembling reality. It's just fanwank scifi.
Comment Re:I think there's another factor at play: (Score 1) 40
I've heard the comparison with OCR (turning a scanned page into letters). Imagine if you scanned one page every minute, and every typo was a carcrash. That's self-driving.
Comment Re: - a new unit of measure ! (Score 2) 34
Comment Re:College is not for everyone (Score 1) 140
I'd much rather have someone who understands people and how to organize and construct a team actually lead a team than someone who has mostly technical skills being the leader of a group.
In my experience, it's signficantly easier to teach a technical person some management skills than it is to teach a manager some technical skills. That's an experience based on doing it myself and working under/with quite a few of them.
Comment Re: Meh (Score 1) 140
Sure, it shouldn't be a huge department, but there is value.
This is the key part. Human civilization needs a little of everything, and there is absolutely value in having some people who specialize in very niche topics. Some amazing things come from the study of niches topics, even in social studies. But we absolutely don't need thousands upon thousands of people who are experts in the same niche, because it's a niche.
Comment Re:Well obviously (Score 1) 198
Comment Who could have suspected (Score 3, Interesting) 198
Comment Re:It might actually happen... (Score 1) 87
Comment Re:It might actually happen... (Score 1) 87
Comment Re:"Little-acknowledged" - WTF? (Score 1) 321
Of course, I have a 300km range, and if I want to use all of that charge without driving in a circle, I need to cross national borders. It's kind a luxury position.
Comment Re:Take it with a grain of salt (Score 1) 85
But I know half a dozen >40 people who buy into this nonsense hook, line and sinker.
Comment Re: How big? How heavy? How efficient? (Score 1) 54
Average scuba tanks are 21% O2 by volume, matching the atmosphere, but may be other ratios depending on the task at hand. You can use a 100% O2 tank safely down to 6 m, at which point the risk of seizure from oxygen toxicity becomes too high for most.
Not exactly. the gas inside the tank is 21% (or whatever you want, really), but don't forget the tank itself it also very heavy and quite bulky, especially when adding all the other equipment.