The primary purpose of the iphone is a *phone*. The primary purpose of the ipad is a *web surfing appliance*. With regards to iphone folks are willing to deal with some limited functionality since that is not it's main goal in life. With the ipad it's unforgivable that it can't surf 70% of today's web content.

I find it interesting that the title is why "Flash is fundamentally flawed on touchscreen devices" and not "Why Certain Touchscreen Devices (aka iPad) are limited and will not work with Flash". This is obviously an attack on the Flash framework as a way to redirect criticism away from the iPad. Apple has clearly mistepped here and now they are trying to do damage control. My understanding is that other touchscreen devices that are coming out in the market place will support Flash (e.g., HP Slate), and it will probably be seamless. I was quite interested in the iPad when the news came out but now that it won't support Flash, and locks users into the monopolistic "App Store" I am no longer interested. Only Apple would try something like this... they seem to be stuck in the monopolistic 90s.

We should develop a program (if one doesn't already exists) that look for an attack on SP1 vulnerabilities. If an attack is detected then the IP address is logged and automatically sent to the server provider (or if possible email address of the user) to inform them that their machine is compromised. I'm sure people would be VERY happy to know they have a virus/trojan on their system and would be more than willing to get rid of it. Heck if someone sent me an email saying, "hey bud you're system is a zombie and tried to attack me", I'd fix my system pronto.

It seems to me that the problem isn't so much that idiots make software which zombie machines, but that we have no way to contact the users of those machines to fix them!