Comment Re:Except they didn't. (Score 1) 455
I would be gaining more work experience. Always a plus. There is no need to work like that. If you work 17 hours a day, 7 days a week. You or your project manager is doing something unproductive. Maybe reassess your design?. I've worked on many projects that where due in say 3 months, when in reality they were 9+ months projects. Even then I didn't need to work more than 12 hours, usually(rarely; In those instances the client wanted something changed or added, asap). It's about proper time management and knowing your teams' strengths and limitations. Occasionally some of those extra hours put in, was helping out other team member(s). Again, know your team. Not just at work, outside of work as well.
When I started, a college degree was not a requirement. You jumped to a new contract when yours was finished, via your network of associates. They did the same. Of course that all changed circa 2000 when HRs started to do the hiring process. My network has run thin. Lack of a degree makes it hard these days. So yes, I would take 2.50/hr. Less money doesn't always equate to lesser quality. It's just a rare gem to find, and that gem is me! I'm old school, were code auditing was the norm. Not like most kids these days. Where they run test suites and pray it passes. Don't get me wrong. Test suites are vital, but limited with out a proper audit.
It's about loving what you do best.
I'm not independently wealthy. I was just smart enough to save and not take on bank notes or mortgages. So, I only need a basic income to make due. That's with a family.