Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:If they have a warrant (Score 1) 136

In that case, it was decided on the idea that the gathering of metadata provided limited insight to a persons life, and that is no longer the case.

It was never the case, or law enforcement would never have started collecting it in the first place. It was merely a bullshit argument to get around that pesky 4th amendment.

Comment Re:What is the MightyMartian plan? (Score 4, Interesting) 406

Mass murder is becoming common because of ISIS. You don't like Newt's ideas.

What are your ideas?

Don't bring us a problem, we have enough of those. Bring us a solution.

The Orlando massacre, while tragic, would have to occur daily to crack the top 5 causes of death. Even then, I'm not sure it would. If you took the combined global death tolls of every terrorist act in the last two decades and condensed them into a single quarter, then put it on repeat, it still wouldn't make the top 5 annual US deaths.

Terrorism is vastly overblown as a threat to any of us. Far more damage is done to our daily lives in the name of stopping terrorism than has ever been done in the name of it.

So, I agree the best solution is not to do nothing - the best solution is to dismantle all the somethings people have done in the last two decades under the guise of protecting us from terrorism.

Comment Re: median vs average (Score 1) 622

I have done similar, but with a twist: I have bought used cars with cash from my parents when they wanted to get something newer. I know the condition/history of the car, I get a good deal, and my state waives sales tax when transferring the property to another family member if you fill out the right forms.

Added bonus: since I primarily bike commute to work, I get another 5-10 years out of the car.

Comment Re:Prime Directive (Score 5, Interesting) 359

Given the fallout from all our meddling in other countries' affairs (particularly the middle east), the prime directive is looking better and better every day.

The same reasoning was given for the prime directives several times in TNG -- the federation encountered several another species that weren't technologically as advanced, they interfered, and everyone was the worse for it.

Comment Re:Divide and conquer (Score 2) 144

why would any sane person invest their time in qualifying for such a career if its longevity is threatened.

Because IT isn't threatened. With computers going into everything, IT is here to stay, and it is going to continue increasing as a proportion of all jobs. This is in spite of the industry's attempts to kill itself with cut corners, aversion to experience, and constant reinventing-of-the-wheel due to a refusal to learn from history.

Comment Re:How many false claims? (Score 4, Insightful) 116

DMCA full text

The DMCA contains the word perjury twice: once in relation to the person making the claim, and once in relation to the person making a counter-claim:

(vi) A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly in-fringed.

You'll note that the only statement subject to perjury is that the claimant is authorized to act on behalf of a rights owner. The first half, about accuracy, is not subject to the same penalty. The prior section (v) mentions that a statement must be made that there is a good faith belief that the subject of the claim is infringing, but it makes no mention of any penalties if this is untrue.

There is some token language later on about misrepresentation - that the claimant is liable for any damages incurred by the alleged infringer should the claimant knowingly misrepresent that the material is infringing. However, proving there was intentional misrepresentation is a pretty high bar, and in most cases, the damages are low enough as to be not worth the legal fight anyways.

Comment Re:This is why (Score 1) 156

As consumers, it is our job to set the standards by which businesses should operate. If they fail to live up to those standards, it is our job to cease doing business with them. That's how the free market works.

If Google, Facebook, et. al. start censoring their content, even it it starts out innocently at first by censoring "extreme" content, then I will simply move on to other services, and I would encourage others to follow suit.

It starts to cross a line if we discuss enacting laws to control what they can do, but so far, I haven't seen any such suggestions.

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?