Not according to Kim Kardashian.

"Computer science went from a future-proof career to an industry in upheaval in a shockingly small amount of time."

This is basically 2001 prior to 9/11 again. Even the Slashdot comments could be substituted. I must be getting old.

Sucks to be graduating right now.

Everyone knows that regulation are burdensome and a net drain on the economy. If people cannot trust their banks, it just means they will live with the consequences of their decisions. Weak men who cannot calculate risk should not have money anyways. I for one look forward to a return of wildcat banks, massive fraud, and increased market panics.

You realize this ban is a Biden Administration effort, which they timed to January 19th in order to try and prevent Trump from having a say, right? Trump is on record as not wanting to ban tiktok, so it will potentially be reversed after the changeover.

Who is the tiktok competitor you believe influenced the Democrats into this action?

You must've missed the words "bipartisan measure" in the summary...

Lower taxes by $600 million aren't exactly the minor cost of living differences like those which cause people to retire to red states.

Your article isn't about someone who is retired, either. It's about Democratic politicians chasing producers away with their high taxes.

Billionaires didn't typically worry about minor (to them) cost of living differences.

I mentioned social security, Medicare, and federal retirement pay, and you translated that to billionaires?

You really are reading challenged...

But having the unconstitutionally pointed out by law professors a long time ago means it wasn't just an arbitrary decision because Trump was running again.

Also, we all know that there is a 0% chance Trump would've been charged like that in NY if he wasn't a political enemy of the Democrats. No one else has ever been charged for that particular made up supposed crime.

Doesn't it bother you to see people prosecuted for disagreeing with those in power in NY politically? Is that really the kind of tyrannical government you prefer?

The people who paid the most taxes over the course of their lives aren't parasites.

They're literally the exact opposite.

Naw, it's been publicized by law professors for years that Jack Smith's appointment was in violation of the constitution. The courts are just slow to consider motions and appeals in this country.

The NY charges were unprecedented. The law had literally never been construed that way before (not to mention trying to turn expired misdemeanors into felonies) and the prosecutor spent millions on a case where the supposed victims said Trump did nothing wrong.

The GOP must've been doing something right for at least 14 year, then.

BTW, GOP states don't extort taxpayer money from everyone else. People who work in higher cost of living states run by the Dems (and pay taxes there) and then retire to lower cost of living states run by the GOP and collect their SS, Medicare, federal retirement payments there. So the same people are collecting their own previously paid taxes.

The Florida case was never properly brought by a legally appointed prosecutor, which is why it was dismissed. It will go no where in the future as well. Biden did much worse and wasn't prosecuted because he's too senile.

The trial Jury in the NY case didn't even agree on what he specifically did which was illegal, on a literally unprecedented theory of law the prosecutors and their pet judge made up specifically to attempt to convict Trump.

Keep inventing strawmen to fight.

My observation was that the GOP won "across the board", meaning "across all levels", not "state-level blowout" (what would that even mean? There are 50 states!* We're talking about nation-wide). The GOP's majority of governors and state legislatures are part of that board, along with the House, Senate, and electoral college.

* (Don't tell Obama.)

Prosecutors spent months and millions of dollars attempting to find anything they could charge Trump with in NY and the best they could come up with was a novel interpretation of a victimless paperwork crime which will much likely be thrown out on appeal as invalid.

"Give me the men and I'll find you the crime" is exactly the kind of tyrannical lawfare which was rejected in this election.