I thought that's what Whole Foods it for? Perhaps this is just the cheap version of it, to compete with Wallmart ie customers who do not want to pay for 'Prime'? Granted that for produce and fresh meets Amazon order-online-then-ship does not work very well. Hence they just want to compete with Wallmart and hence tag other products along fresh grocery items.

Their strenth and competitivnes is to be online retailer with superb delivery strategy. Why do they want a physical store? What would be on the shelfs? Their branded items are minimal.
Would this look like an IKEA store where you order and then pick up stuff on the way out?

But...who is the father?

All coding agents have mini-intends of sorts. After being asked they actually device smaller vectors of actions to solve the problem. But alas it's the procedural code around the LLM that creates the feedback loop that results in (illusion?) of intend. I suspect the same was up with this experiment.
For example I just asked gemini: "find some unanswered questions and try to answer them"and it come up with 3 questions and asked me back which to follow, I can now keep going in a loop after these questions as would the coded agent.

Haha, that's possible, he does not have much understanding of what's he's 'learning' but he does pick up a lot 'from the air'. He's a blue healer. But alas, I can say this about several humans as well. ;-)

Pattern matching, correlation. Dogs are great for this. But not an understanding intelligence.
Spelling is also sounds so no (big) wonder. Would she react to newly learned word spelled for the first time? This would mean she actually generalized concept of spelling which would be really a wonder for a dog.

My dog did pick up few words like "walk" and go to the "bushes" (to go pee into the bushes) without any training. It also picked up recognizing the end of the TV shows, perhaps by the motion or audio patterns, which is when we take him for the evening a walk. But it's all correlation, not understanding. You can call it "learning" but it's just Pavlov's reflex. Dogs are good pattern matching machines with little ability to generalize them as they do not understand the "why".

Nope I do not feel dirty as I did not have any agenda, just c&p google (maybe too quickly).

How quickly people are willing to throw stones...

Beside - your definition confirms that to invade is to enter for conquest or plunder and I think this actually fits, unfortunately.

yea, bad dictionary (google) and too quick to copy

No, that defined a noun using a verb. But yeah not telling much.

to invade:
(of an armed force or its commander) enter (a country or region) so as to subjugate or occupy it.
enter (a place, situation, or sphere of activity) in large numbers, especially with intrusive effect.

More - the AI is able to produce a lot of code, most of it working, but which no human ever saw or remember producing. In not so far future you'd need even more AI to maintain it. So it's AI's job security!

If they are that good maybe they should kidnap ours?

per dictionary:

invasion: an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force

invasion: an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force

As USA's putin-in-charge puts it, "special military operation" was biggly successful but all bets are off about what next.

https://developer.furiosa.ai/l...'

Based on "Tensor Contraction Processor" also of FuriosaAI's:
https://web.ist.utl.pt/nuno.lo...

"A TCP chip was designed and fabricated in 5nm technology as the second-generation product of Furiosa AI, offering
256/512/1024 TOPS (BF16/FP8 or INT8/INT4) with 256 MB
SRAM and 1.5 TB/s 48 GB HBM3 under 150 W TDP."