Re:Well, good for you. (Score 1)

I was chastising 1) the person who submitted the article, and 2) the /. editors. Perhaps it was unreasonable to come down on the guy who was just submitting the story that he thought was accurate. Still, I think it was very easy to find info which contradicts what is in the story (for instance, on the sony website).

Some might say that the editors don't have any responsibility to check the facts of a story before they post it. I disagree. I think there is due diligence which is proper and wasn't done.

So maybe instead of RTFA, it's check the facts, man.