Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:VR is the new 3D TV (Score 1) 128

Having tried it -- I disagree.

The hardware is excellent. (Talking about the Vive, but I guess the Oculus is similar). The software is enough to see the potential, but there's huge room for improvement.

90% of the people who I've seen try it have been extremely impressed. This includes kids (4 yrs old, 5 yrs old) and people who would never touch a 3D game. It's just incredibly easy to use and very, very compelling.

The technology has delivered. Whether it will take off is now a matter of marketing, cost, and the network effect -- there need to be more developers, more users, for software quality to increase.

Submission + - SPAM: Dart is fastest growing language at Google, 2nd fastest in TIOBE

An anonymous reader writes: Google's Dart language is growing quickly according to Google and TIOBE, where it reached 17th place for January 2017. Growth outside Google is likely driven by web apps in Angular 2, and worth watching this year is Flutter for Android and iOS apps. Inside Google, the rewrite of AdWords in Dart is a huge bet on Dart.

Submission + - Subsecond hot reload for Android with Flutter

An anonymous reader writes: The best thing at Google's recent Dart Developer Summit was an update on Flutter, a new way of building Android and iOS apps in Dart. The keynote showed hot reload in under a second (video) and the followup talk (video) gave an in depth look at the developer workflow Flutter provides. Google developers using Flutter claimed they were 3x more productive than with the standard Android tools.

Comment That's not what the study says AT ALL (Score 5, Informative) 134

If you actually read it, the study is about whether standing desks reduce the amount of time you spend sitting.

It doesn't say anything about whether sitting is bad except in the "background" section, which says "Physical inactivity at workplaces and particularly increased sitting has been linked to increase in cardiovascular disease, obesity and overall mortality."

So, pretty much the opposite of what the article is implying.

Submission + - Moozvine: Crowd Funding for Sci-Fi

An anonymous reader writes: Webologist reports on Moozvine, a startup offering crowd funding for sci-fi authors and a pay-as-you-like model for sci-fi fans. Stories either start free or require a minimum pledge to unlock; once unlocked they remain free forever.

"Many great authors are currently lost in the depths of the archaic publishing system – if they are not favoured by a publisher their work is essentially lost forever. With Moozvine authors can build up their fanbase with each new book, story or poem and this will allow them to set higher thresholds."

Four stories are already unlocked, including Soft Apocalypse, the short story that led to Hugo Award winner Will McIntosh's first novel.

Comment Re:going in circles (Score 1) 344

That's a personal estimate. I don't know why there isn't research into the TouchStream: there should be. It's why I talk about it at every opportunity, in the hope that all this work is built on rather than forgotten...

Mice and keyboards certainly win in a comparison between somebody who's been using a mouse and keyboard for >1 month and someone who just picked up a TouchStream. Doing a fair comparison would be quite a lot of work, unfortunately.

But for me personally I can assure you that I work more quickly on a TouchStream than with mouse+keyboard. This doesn't prove anything, since it's only one data point, but using a mouse+keyboard is a pretty obvious barrier to work. (Which, BTW, is chiefly email and programming. Editing code is far faster with integrated mousing.)

Comment Re:going in circles (Score 1) 344

Again from experience I must disagree. It's bad for a keyboard to have no travel because you miss the precise "did I press the key or not" feedback. But it's not bad for your hands.

It's bad for a keyboard to have no pressure needed because without some clever multitouch technology there's no way to tell whether you meant to press the key and it would get very annoying.

There are lots of reasons for keyboards to be as they are, but I don't think comfort is one of them.

Presumably you can do the wrong thing with a TouchStream and hammer away at it, but I haven't found that to be necessary.

Comment Re:going in circles (Score 2, Informative) 344

I disagree: the keyboard and mouse do not work really well. What they are is really easy to start using, and good enough.

The TouchStream takes at least a month or two to get used to. Most people spent that long getting started with a keyboard, and aren't willing to invest the time again learning a new device. Nor is there any pressing need except for power users.

For those power users, though, the TouchStream presents a potentially big[1] boost to productivity and comfort. At least, that's what I found.

[1] Where "big" is ~20%. That's only big if you're working 8 hours a day...

Comment Re:Not for desktop pc's, but (Score 1) 344

I can offer direct insight into your questions courtesy of years of experience using the Fingerworks TouchStream:

MultiTouch devices are very precise. In fact, moreso than a mouse for fine movements, because they take an average over the whole contact area so subpixel movements are possible.

You can have a keyboard. See the TouchStream. It works really well and is more efficient than a mouse+keyboard combo. Use of MultiTouch makes the keyboard itself vastly more efficient: gestures and chords are all available without leaving the keyboard.

I've played Doom 3 using the TouchStream. It's not as good as a keyboard+mouse combo but I'll bet it beats gamepad.

Slashdot Top Deals

I think there's a world market for about five computers. -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943