Also to your point, if you're flying internationally, you're letting them take your picture when you come into Customs anyways.

Nah. This is where people confuse free speech.
I don't have to give you that platform and I wont degrade the quality of my publication by even giving tripe like that a foot to stand on. Take that shit to infowars.

Don't you? TV has taught me this is how to get away without paying.

How do you propose shipping several tons as your luggage? Or even transporting that to a casino undetected?

Oh wow . . . I've never seen going rates for an software engineer in India (not sarcasm, i am genuinely shocked).

Seeing it in black and white really helps paint the picture.

Sony begs to differ.

But . . . he said the truth is out there!

Your point is very valid as I am currently writing an advisory for my workplace on this issue, so my only counterpoint is this:

How secure is your workplace WiFi? Could an ex-employee sit in a car next to your building and cause havoc?

False. There is only one true being, and we all marvel and one day hope to be embraced in His noodley appendage.

Ramen.

lol, calm down grandpa. what you quantify as the appropriate amount of picture taking is exactly that.

No one*
grammar*
And you forgot to end your last sentence with a period.

You're posting to Slashdot. Your argument, stated clear enough for a 5th grader to grasp will be ignored for the same reason it is ignored elsewhere.

Take it from a black man who's father taught him the ropes decades ago. Pick your battles and accept change will be generational-ly slow.

That is very true that most first time offenders could get off with a warning, but we are talking about on the job offenses.
You LITERALLY cannot find a workplace in this country that you can assault, batter and steal from someone and not expect to be thrown in jail and lose your job.

Except for being an officer, apparently.

Just glad theres not dildo maximum in my state, or I would still be in my mom's basement.

Thanks Obama.