Comment Re:Me too (Score 2) 639
Why every discussion on IPv6 always starts with the address space.
What about mobility, security, routing optimization, better QoS support, etc.
What about mobility, security, routing optimization, better QoS support, etc.
And please don't say a hammered solution like NAT is the way to go - I guess everyone from the VoIP/streaming/P2P worlds is familiar with the headaches of trasversing NAT devices.
About using your MAC address to built a local automatic IPv6 is plain simple, MAC addresses (namely ethernet ones) are unique!
IPv6 does not replace/obsoletes DHCP, that's why there's DHCPv6 - but DHCP is a service, autoconfiguration in IPv6 is meant to be automatic and not dependent in configured/maintened services.
IPv6 was brought up by the same people who brought up and manage the Internet up to now - IETF! They made a good job the first time, do you think they lost it?